A significant portion of the population in the USA still thinks of Reaganomics as certified fact rather than a largely discredited theory. By this mindset the engine of our economy requires people to strive for a ton of money. A rising tide lifts all boats and all that. First, I got to wondering, were US billionaires even a thing at the end of Reagan’s term? As a tween at the time, I couldn’t really remember. Turns out, yes: Sam Walton • $6.7 billion • Wal-Mart Stores John Kluge • $3.2 billion • Metromedia Ross Perot • $3.0 billion • Electronic...
This is posed as a question. It should be a statement. We don’t need billionaires!
So just why would the title ask the question? even the fact the article tries to rationalise a tad for tax purpose makes me skeptical of the purpose of this piece. I as an individual are getting sick of everything having to be a debate…and I am expected to be nice to the greedy and hurtful. I am done with tolerance, its not a question or a conversation, we don’t need to be brought round with media or education. They should not exist!
This is posed as a question. It should be a statement. We don’t need billionaires!
So just why would the title ask the question? even the fact the article tries to rationalise a tad for tax purpose makes me skeptical of the purpose of this piece. I as an individual are getting sick of everything having to be a debate…and I am expected to be nice to the greedy and hurtful. I am done with tolerance, its not a question or a conversation, we don’t need to be brought round with media or education. They should not exist!