I see now I wasted my time with my comment on this thread. The answer is no, your bubble does not contain facts and you should look in a mirror about that.

Im going to assume positive intent here, as my knee jerk reaction is to say no, there are not any right leaning sources that are calling Trump a nazi, nor are they calling Israel genocidal maniacs.

Barring that, this isnt really a one-sentence answer kind of question. What is “right-leaning”? What was “right” 30 years ago barely crosses into center now. So news sources that you see labeled as center would have been your primary sources for right wing news.

As far as factuality goes, there is a deep seated campaign around for profit, national multimedia companies to spoonfeed the masses straight up lies, and its working. I want to emphasize that this is a propaganda machine designed to divert pressure from the blatant robbing of the majority of America to feed the top 0.1% of people. You will not find truthful right leaning sources, and moreover, it will be difficult to find truthful LEFT leaning sources, especially around Gaza.

While I would agree, both of those are theoretical - just like my example. The truth is we haven’t, and can’t, test these things and see their mechanisms take place because of their timescales. But it is a really fun thought experiment

Well, its kind of a matter of debate really on the black holes, and its in regard to the law of conservation of information. I’ll freely admit, we are getting to the edge of my understanding here, but essentially black holes very nature of being inescapable by anything means that information, once inside, is permanently lost.

The reason hawking radiation was such a big deal is that it found a way for this information to potentially be released into the universe once again. That radiation is actually a pair of “virtual particles” (which aren’t real particles, more a mathematical trick to describe complex interactions between different fields and their particles). One of the particles “pops in” to existence on the inside of the event horizon and one on the outside, thus separating the pair. One falls in, one escapes. But since they didn’t annihilate the energy that the now real particle has must come from the black hole, hence, the energy has escaped the black hole.

Now, is that “action” a reaction, or is it a brand new action with no inciting incident? I dont have an answer, and its up to speculation because hawking radiation may or may not even exist. But its our best guess.

I get the confusion, but a reference frame is a very important limitation for calculating what you need. Its not about whether the arm exists behind the hand, but whether its effects are important for the calculation.

For the sake of the hand pushing the ball, its not. Only the momentum of the hand and the inertia of the ball are important.

That strongly depends on your reference frame. As in, what system are you looking at? Where are you drawing your box? If your box is around the entire universe, then yes, every action is a reaction stemming from the big bang, with very few notable exceptions pertaining to black holes that I wont go into.

However, if your reference frame is a hand and a ball, then the hand pushing the ball is an original action, the ball moving its reaction.

Jake

If I had my current knowledge, low-level iron forging, agriculture, and architecture (cisterns, wells, deep food storage) and very rudimentary medicine because the wife is obsessed with various herbs that are used to make our modern medicine

If I was starting from scratch, probably just be decent at hunting because I have good hand eye coordination and maybe tracking