You’re not wrong. I’d say the biggest difference is that the oppression is now more overt and intense.

America is quickly becoming a dystopia for anyone with some semblance of a conscience.

So does shitting in your hand and throwing it at the first person you see. Doesn’t mean it’s a good idea.

All the money in the world, yet you choose to live in that depressing ass mansion.

Seriously, I’ve seen trailer park homes that are more uplifting.

No, what’s shitty is your bootyhole. Bad toilet paper just handles it poorly which is shitty in its own way.

Oh okay, doesn’t seem like a big deal then.

Context? What dude?

Ah yes, cantankerous, a word I haven’t seen in quite a minute. What are the odds, huh?

I’m not sure what you’re trying to say here. Freedom of speech is always relative to culture and power.

My comment is more a funny way to dismiss OP’s opinion, not commentary on free speech.

You know, maybe freedom of speech isn’t such a good idea after all.

Means TV is a streaming service that runs like a co-op, but as far as I know subscribers don’t get a share in said co-op.

Your idea is certainly interesting, though.

I’m no biologist, but I’m pretty sure this ignores how fluid the evolution is from regular bird to proto-chicken to chicken.

At that point the genetic difference would be too small to not call that bird some sort of chicken.