If you pass a whole raw disk, not virtualized, then TrueNAS should not complain. I don’t know if you can do that in proxmox, I haven’t tried.
Personally I’d get rid of TrueNAS. Even if docker is down, the VM with the data is still up and accessible over anything running on the VM, like scp via ssh.
It sounds like there’s been some change since that happened. I would review the current terms and GPLv3, if that’s the one you want to use.
Sounds like monkeys and typewriters.
Memtest? Boot a live image and stress test each component?
I don’t think it’s overheating, usually that presents as throttling followed by a thermal protection power off.
Well it’s not open source that I see, so you’ll be doing significant development to match it. There are probably place clones that you can use as a start, then tie in OSM. But that’s far easier said than done.
If you’re adding drives with more capacity, why bother converting? Just create the new one, copy the data, then expand over the old disks.
Have backups for anything you can’t afford to lose, and be patient.
Change.org doesn’t verify legitimacy of signers either.
I’m not aware of one, but if you have the need, you could write it yourself in an afternoon. It’s a simple website. A weekend, if you don’t have much experience.
Not everything runs in a container.
I don’t think you want two VPN services, I think you want one VPN service and plain network routing. Use the VPN server as the local gateway, and the VPN server routes that traffic up the tunnel.
I think you should seek someone with experience, a mentor. Otherwise it’s the blind leading the blind.
It would be easiest to just change the client addresses frequently. You should be able to configure that in your addressing system.
Add :ro for read-only.
WAF and DMZ too.
Always have. Did you never read/watch V for Vendetta?
“IP is good, actually” shouldn’t be a hot take. Those are the laws that licensing is built on.
It uses stripe