Almost all business applications have horizontal menus and ribbons that take up a decent percentage of a landscape monitor instead of utilising the “spare” screen space on the left or right, and a taskbar usually sits at the bottom or top of the screen eating up even more space (yes I know this can be changed but it’s not the default).

Documents are traditionally printed/read in portrait which is reflected on digital documents.

Programmers often rotate their screens to be portrait in order to see more of the code.

Most web pages rarely seem to make use of horizontal real estate, and scrolling is almost universally vertical. Even phones are utilised in portrait for the vast majority of time, and many web pages are designed for mobile first.

Beyond media consumption and production, it feels like the most commonly used workplace productivity apps are less useful in landscape mode. So why aren’t more office-based computer screens giant squares instead of horizontal rectangles?

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    The market is to optimize for max human eyesight, which is a horizontal aspect ratio. For edge cases, a monitor can be converted to a vertical aspect ratio easily.

    There really isn’t a large market to go square. If anything, monitors have gotten wider over time.

    • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not to mention I only want to go wider.

      The immersion for gaming is all I car for, my work laptop is for work and it’s something I hardly use as a mechanic