In light of recent controversy and its handling, the twice-a-year FediForum unconference for April 1st and 2nd has been canceled by its organizer.

  • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t know, I would not say that I knew automatically when I was born what’s the difference between “man” and “woman”.

    Nor did I. For me, it came around the same time I started to understand gender and sex. The more I understood it, the more I knew it was wrong.

    To me, “man” and “woman” can’t be labels that go beyond the social/behavioral because I don’t know what it feels like to be a man anymore than what I know it feels like to be a woman…

    For me, it was initially tied in the physical. I knew my body should have been different. I wished it was different. I dreamed, prayed, hoped and fantasized that it would be different. It was an awareness that I was “like them” with girls and “not like them” with boys. I knew it was wrong when I was grouped with boys.

    That’s what it felt like. Not an understanding of others peoples experiences, but an understanding of how my own sense of self was at odds with both my body, and the assumptions that my body created in people.

    For someone who doesn’t feel gender, then of course you aren’t going to understand the experience of folk who do, anymore than I can understand what it’s like to not feel it. All I can is that analogies about colour aren’t particularly apt here, because it doesn’t work like that. My gender doesn’t exist because of shared consensus (although it is shaped by that consensus). My gender doesn’t exist because I was able to understand other peoples experiences. My gender is just something I’ve always felt, and that I’ve tried to make sense of over the years. I describe it now in clear, defined terms, but when I was younger, it didn’t work like that. I knew my body was wrong, but the social stuff, the gender stuff? Finding the words for that would take decades. But even as I said, I was finding the words to describe an experience that was always there.

    • Ferk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The experience you describe requires interaction with other people who you (and society) categorizes as “girls” and “boys”.

      Without this interaction with this external categorization: would you have been able to find anything was “different”?

      I feel that in order to have something feel “different” you need to have something to compare it to. Something you can perceive from others and that thus it must be reflected externally and not just something purely internal at the level of qualia (otherwise you wouldn’t be able to compare it). So this is what I meant by archetype/label/stereotype/pick-your-word. That thing you felt was different which you perceived when comparing with other people outside of yourself.

      • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Without this interaction with this external categorization: would you have been able to find anything was “different”?

        Yes.

        The words I use to describe it would be different. If I grew up on an island of men, I’d have been completely lost trying to understand it, and may never have found the words, but I would still have felt it, because I was already feeling it before I had the words.

        Trans people are real. Our experience of gender is real. Those experiences don’t align with yours, but that doesn’t stop them being real. Trans people exist in one form or another, across every civilisation, and have done so through the length of recorded history.

        You won’t find a “gotcha”. You won’t make other folks experience match yours, just because you don’t understand theirs.

        • Ferk@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          In an island of men (not women) you would be exposed to the same different external behaviors and preferences associated to the archetype that you do not identify with, so of course you would feel a difference.

          These external behaviors and preferences you perceive as different is what I was referring to with archetype/label/stereotype/pick-your-word.

          • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Stop trying to tell me my own experience. You don’t experience gender. Stop trying to speak for people who do.

            • Ferk@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Sorry, I was just agreeing with what you said in your second paragraph. Because it makes complete logical sense what you said there. So the “of course you would” was just a reaffirmation of what you described yourself, not a mandate over what you should feel.

              Also, I do experience gender, just the same way as I experience color, taste, pain, happiness and all other experiences. I tried to explain it when I gave the example with “green” before. I experience green… what I don’t know is if “what it feels like” to experience green for me could really be identified with “green” beyond the social understanding I have from my interactions with other people when we see green.