Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agoLinux lays down the law on AI-generated code, says yes to Copilot, no to AI slop, and humans take the fall for mistakes — after months of fierce debate, Torvalds and maintainers come to an agreementwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square296linkfedilinkarrow-up1722arrow-down138
arrow-up1684arrow-down1external-linkLinux lays down the law on AI-generated code, says yes to Copilot, no to AI slop, and humans take the fall for mistakes — after months of fierce debate, Torvalds and maintainers come to an agreementwww.tomshardware.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square296linkfedilink
minus-squareell1e@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-28 hours agoSo do you want to legally review every line by an LLM to see if it meets the fair use criterion, since you have to assume it was probably stolen? And would you do this for a known plagiarizing human contributor too…?
minus-squareAlex@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 hours agoNo, that’s why the author asserts that with their signed-of-by. It’s what I do if I use any LLM content as the basis of my patches.
So do you want to legally review every line by an LLM to see if it meets the fair use criterion, since you have to assume it was probably stolen? And would you do this for a known plagiarizing human contributor too…?
No, that’s why the author asserts that with their signed-of-by. It’s what I do if I use any LLM content as the basis of my patches.