• vandsjov@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    Your comparison with going out after dark is totally off. It’s much easier to monitor if the kid is in the house than if they access web site they shouldn’t.

    Just to blame the parents is too easy. There’s a reason why porn, alcohol, and cigarettes is not allowed to be sold to minors in shops. What you’re asking is that parents shouldn’t allow their kids to to go to shops, just so you don’t have to be provide proof of your age to access to alcohol in your local shop.

    More and more of our lives are online and I totally see why we need to do propper online verification for some things.

    • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Agreed. The “parents are too blame” crowd is insane to me. How are you gonna control what your kid does on the wifi hotspot Derek in the last row on the school bus created?

      The app (open source, cross platform, completely locally, no photo id, no 3rd parties involved) only provides sites with a yes/no on “is person over 18?”, via an on-device zkp.

      So good luck pitching a solution that is more privacy friendly than this, because this is pretty much the perfect solution. I’m honestly elated that the EU is releasing this, because it means I’ll NOT need to deal with privacy-nightmare situations like in other countries where legislation came before a technical solution. This lays a fantastic baseline for the EU to force companies to use THIS solution for age verification, essentially killing the data harvesters dead.