I can’t. I just can’t.

  • Archr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Last year I drove my parent’s car which is equipped with one of these cameras that determine if the driver is distracted or dozing. And I can say for certain that it works. I honestly wish that my car had this sort of a system.

    I view this tech like a padlock. Sure some people will do whatever they can to get around it, but it keeps honest people honest. If it can reduce deaths on the road from drunk and tired drivers even by a little bit then isn’t that worth it?

    I’m not sure what you mean by not being able to follow up… Driving drunk and killing someone is already punished harshly, and you can even follow up civilly; it’s called a wrongful death suit.

    • anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Last year I drove my parent’s car which is equipped with one of these cameras that determine if the driver is distracted or dozing. And I can say for certain that it works.

      I rented two different modern (2015-2016) Mercedes SUVs. They both had systems that detected tired/inattentive driving. I was neither but after several hours on the road both vehicles would alert that it was time to take a break with a nice little coffee icon. I was conversing with a passenger, driving fine, not wandering between lanes/etc… The first time I kind of doubted myself but subsequent notifications both the passenger and myself were agreeing that we had no idea what it was upset about.

      The newer car had another sensor that would get upset if your grip on the steering wheel got too light. That was kind of neat to see how much leeway it’d give you before it got antsy.

      • Archr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Probably because you were driving for a few hours. That makes sense. You may not feel it but driving is an active task that takes more effort than just sitting in a chair.

        I would much rather have this system have false positives rather than not have it at all.

    • munk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It doesn’t work on everyone. These systems have trouble with certain eye shapes, eye makeup, etc.

      • Archr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        What about their proposed solution requires any of this data to leave the vehicle?

        • dreamkeeper@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          The law says nothing about keeping the data in the vehicle, so it will 100% be sent outside the vehicle. Most modern cars already transmit your data so why would they change anything?

          • Archr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            You are right. Because the law says nothing about the requirements. They haven’t decided on them yet. Come back when they propose something.

            • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              And so long as they aren’t proposing privacy protections, I will continue to raise a stink about it. Modern cars already share way too much of our private data.