• azimir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    3 days ago

    No wonder Putin is taking a pass on attending. It would make his time and location line up publicly.

      • CAVOK@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Probably bad.

        The reason why I doubt that Ukraine would attack Moscow on Victory Day is that the risk of killing innocents would be high, which could (would) make Russians rally around the flag.

        I do like the threat though. Putin and Russia shouldn’t be confident that Ukraine won’t attack, which causes a dilemma for them.

        • testaccount372920@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 days ago

          I agree that the threat is a smart move. Either Russia command responds, showing the population that everything is not going as well as they pretend. Or they do nothing, in which case they have deal with the backlash of ‘Oh, why did you do nothing, they told you they would do this’ if Ukraine attacks.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Putin and Russia shouldn’t be confident that Ukraine won’t attack

          A parade is still a parade, an attack would likely kill civilians attending and definitely be a warcrime.

      • Photonic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        A power struggle within Russian command would almost certainly mess things up for the Russians on the battlefield

      • Gladaed@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Was killing the Ayatollah good or bad?

        Decapitation creates a power vacuum and may cause inferiors to act erratically in ways that harm all participants. Such as preventive or random strikes on foreign but not hostile nations. A invasion of e.g. the Baltics may be immediate.

          • Gladaed@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            our optimism may be detached from reality. A us war declaration is all but guaranteed and there are too few NATO troops to repel an invasion before the fall of tallin. The economics of war are currently unfavorable when matching Russian and NATO forces. And economic disparity is not sufficient to be able to succeed at those odds since interceptors are bloody expensive.

            • Ooops@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              there are too few NATO troops to repel an invasion before the fall of tallin.

              Realistically there are also not enough Russian troops available to start such an invasion. Not to talk about the fact that their logistics are too poor to not need months of very obvious troop concentration before even trying.