Robots that look like dogs or people try to replicate symmetrical shapes found in nature. But engineers at Duke University are taking a different approach.
Looks like a lot of redundancy. Or in other words, the design seems wasteful.
Maybe it’s good for something, and it’s cool to try radically different concepts. Who knows, maybe they learn something from it that is actually useful.
Looks like a lot of redundancy. Or in other words, the design seems wasteful.
Maybe it’s good for something, and it’s cool to try radically different concepts. Who knows, maybe they learn something from it that is actually useful.
Redundancy can be good
You could argue that the cost of cameras and actuators is not a limiting factor. I find it interesting