So you think there is white genocide in south Africa and white people are being genocide in Europe through the great replacement? Or is it possible that questioning things not backed by conclusive evidence is not bad but in fact the good and normal thing to do?
It’s not whataboutism. If simply calling something a genocide makes questioning the basis of the claim evil then it only makes sense you believe all accusations. You must clearly stand with white South Africans and white Americans and Europeans against their genocides.
Or maybe questioning claims that are not backed by conclusive evidence is ok.
Or your source is a Wikipedia article that sites Rushan fucking Abbas and articles who then in turn site Adrian Zenz. If someone sites Elon Musk to tell you there is white genocide in South Africa and “the great replacement is real” would you believe them? Also your source does not claim there is a genocide, it makes claims of abuses (which there definitely were but this articles exaggeration of events would be hilarious if it wasn’t such a grim topic). So again we’re back to claims without conclusive evidence that it’s only right to be sceptical of. The OIC and the UN both seem to agree there is no genocide.
Now you’re retreating to Russell’s teapot. “There’s no proof that meets any sort of evidentiary standard (Hence why reports from first-hand delegations to Xinjiang from Egypt, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Thailand, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, the World Bank, and even the fucking UN say it’s not a genocide) but you just have to believe it”. Nonsense.
And we’re again back to a source that itself doesn’t even claim genocide that sites such amazing people as Guantanamo bay torturer and Amerikan intelligence asset Rushan Abbas and a fee more than all site German evangelical on a self proclaimed “mission from god to destroy China” Adrian Zenz. And honestly I’m just more willing to take the OIC, UN and the first hand delegations at their word that there isn’t a genocide than you (especially considering you yourself are a genocide denier).
So you think there is white genocide in south Africa and white people are being genocide in Europe through the great replacement? Or is it possible that questioning things not backed by conclusive evidence is not bad but in fact the good and normal thing to do?
Your whatsboutism is transparent and looks foolish.
It’s not whataboutism. If simply calling something a genocide makes questioning the basis of the claim evil then it only makes sense you believe all accusations. You must clearly stand with white South Africans and white Americans and Europeans against their genocides.
Or maybe questioning claims that are not backed by conclusive evidence is ok.
I’ve provided a lot of evidence that a lot of other people, countries and organizations back up.
My sources will never be good enough for you because you are a genocide denier.
Or your source is a Wikipedia article that sites Rushan fucking Abbas and articles who then in turn site Adrian Zenz. If someone sites Elon Musk to tell you there is white genocide in South Africa and “the great replacement is real” would you believe them? Also your source does not claim there is a genocide, it makes claims of abuses (which there definitely were but this articles exaggeration of events would be hilarious if it wasn’t such a grim topic). So again we’re back to claims without conclusive evidence that it’s only right to be sceptical of. The OIC and the UN both seem to agree there is no genocide.
You’re like a person looking for definite proof of the holocaust using only official German sources before liberation.
Now you’re retreating to Russell’s teapot. “There’s no proof that meets any sort of evidentiary standard (Hence why reports from first-hand delegations to Xinjiang from Egypt, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Thailand, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, the World Bank, and even the fucking UN say it’s not a genocide) but you just have to believe it”. Nonsense.
I’ve provided a lot of evidence that a lot of other people, countries and organizations back up.
My sources will never be good enough for you because you are a genocide denier.
And we’re again back to a source that itself doesn’t even claim genocide that sites such amazing people as Guantanamo bay torturer and Amerikan intelligence asset Rushan Abbas and a fee more than all site German evangelical on a self proclaimed “mission from god to destroy China” Adrian Zenz. And honestly I’m just more willing to take the OIC, UN and the first hand delegations at their word that there isn’t a genocide than you (especially considering you yourself are a genocide denier).