Today’s players finish their points from way back

  • papalonian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    I see, is there a big learning curve or difference when it comes to playing on grass vs a hard court? Like if a professional athlete has a tournament at Wimbledon, and they’ve only ever played on hard courts, would they be at a significant disadvantage to someone who played on grass? Or is it likely that both players will either have no experience with grass, or decent training in both?

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Yes some players play better on a specific surface. Like Nadal was a clay expert, since he is from Spain and Spain doesn’t have many grass courts, most outdoor courts there are clay courts. He has won 14 French Open titles while only 2 Wimbledon titles.

      Though to be fair grass courts are rare everywhere since they are expensive to maintain but they are even rarer in warm and dry countries like Spain

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Are most outdoor courts clay courts? Or just the ones at a high enough level? It seems to me like hard courts are probably cheaper and require little to no maintenance. I would assume that the majority of courts are probably the low-maintenance variety.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      There are differences that lead to advantages. If I remember correctly then Nadal was especially good in Paris while Murray was good in Wimbledon.