spiderwort@lemm.eeBanned to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoShould we replace democracy with science?message-squaremessage-square111linkfedilinkarrow-up117arrow-down179
arrow-up1-62arrow-down1message-squareShould we replace democracy with science?spiderwort@lemm.eeBanned to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square111linkfedilink
minus-squarespiderwort@lemm.eeBannedOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down17·1 year ago99% of the voters wouldn’t know science if it bit them on the butt
minus-squareZorque@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 year agoYou make a good case for your own argument.
minus-squarespiderwort@lemm.eeBannedOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down7·1 year agoWell somebody’s got to.
minus-squareZorque@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year agoI mean, trying to prove your own theory by being the perfect case study seems a little extreme…
minus-squaresweng@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoSounds like a wildly unscientific statement, considering e.g ~10% of the US population works in STEM.
minus-squarespiderwort@lemm.eeBannedOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down10·1 year agoThat doesn’t seem to make much of a difference, strangely enough.
99% of the voters wouldn’t know science if it bit them on the butt
You make a good case for your own argument.
Well somebody’s got to.
I mean, trying to prove your own theory by being the perfect case study seems a little extreme…
Sounds like a wildly unscientific statement, considering e.g ~10% of the US population works in STEM.
That doesn’t seem to make much of a difference, strangely enough.