spiderwort@lemm.eeBanned to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoShould we replace democracy with science?message-squaremessage-square109linkfedilinkarrow-up117arrow-down179
arrow-up1-62arrow-down1message-squareShould we replace democracy with science?spiderwort@lemm.eeBanned to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square109linkfedilink
minus-squarespiderwort@lemm.eeBannedOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down17·2 years ago99% of the voters wouldn’t know science if it bit them on the butt
minus-squareZorque@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up13·2 years agoYou make a good case for your own argument.
minus-squarespiderwort@lemm.eeBannedOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down7·2 years agoWell somebody’s got to.
minus-squareZorque@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 years agoI mean, trying to prove your own theory by being the perfect case study seems a little extreme…
minus-squaresweng@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 years agoSounds like a wildly unscientific statement, considering e.g ~10% of the US population works in STEM.
minus-squarespiderwort@lemm.eeBannedOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down10·2 years agoThat doesn’t seem to make much of a difference, strangely enough.
99% of the voters wouldn’t know science if it bit them on the butt
You make a good case for your own argument.
Well somebody’s got to.
I mean, trying to prove your own theory by being the perfect case study seems a little extreme…
Sounds like a wildly unscientific statement, considering e.g ~10% of the US population works in STEM.
That doesn’t seem to make much of a difference, strangely enough.