☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 9 months agoAmerica’s assassination attempt on Huawei is backfiringwww.economist.comexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up127arrow-down114file-text
arrow-up113arrow-down1external-linkAmerica’s assassination attempt on Huawei is backfiringwww.economist.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square16fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareerwan@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·9 months agoIt’s neither. It’s a specification that you can use to build your own chip. So it’s more like MPEG where you can read the doc and create your own implementation.
minus-squareGolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-24 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareerwan@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 months agoHow can you have a preference if you don’t understand?
minus-squareGolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-24 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareerwan@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·9 months agoYes, on the licensing front RISC-V is better.
minus-squareMoonrise2473@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·9 months agoClosed source but if you pay enough you can get the source
deleted by creator
It’s neither. It’s a specification that you can use to build your own chip.
So it’s more like MPEG where you can read the doc and create your own implementation.
deleted by creator
How can you have a preference if you don’t understand?
deleted by creator
Yes, on the licensing front RISC-V is better.
Closed source but if you pay enough you can get the source