• Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    Air superiority relies on having sufficient ammo. And if the recent war in Europe has shown us anything, it’s that having just a couple of really good weapons doesn’t really work unless you also have a shitload of other stuff.

    While Russia can barely maintain a front against Ukraine, they are more than capable of killing people far behind the front lines.

    Like I said, Russia won’t win, they probably wouldn’t hurt us as much as we would hurt them. But they WOULD hurt us.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      Like I said, Russia won’t win, they probably wouldn’t hurt us as much as we would hurt them. But they WOULD hurt us.

      That’s true for any country. Additionally Russia could even anhilate us with their nuclear weapons. Yet do we have to worry as much and pay as much for defence as our politicians tell us to do? At least the EU starts to publish some numbers.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        That’s true for any country

        Yes, but Russia is the only one who has shown they’re extremely likely to do so.

        Yet do we have to worry as much and pay as much for defence as our politicians tell us to do?

        Well if I could predict the future, I would be really stinking rich, and many poor people would be less poor. Unfortunately, here we are.

        • plyth@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          15 days ago

          has shown they’re extremely likely to do so.

          What are the signs that it is extremely likely?

          Well if I could predict the future

          We make the future if we spend on arms instead of health, renewable energy and education. If the risk is overstated it costs lives, just not on the battlefield.