• DonLongSchlong@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    I would say that those governments have positions and opinions that vary widely and that someone saying that all of their positions are equally bad, is peak enlightened centricism.

    Edit: Anarchists do sometimes engage in enlightened centricism and have been called out for that. The difference is that Anarchists believe that the governmentness (“unjustified” hierarchy) of a government is the bad thing and not that every government just so happens to be bad like the comment OP seems to think.

    • myrmidex@belgae.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I made an edit to my previous post:

      to make it more clear: all governments being untrustworthy is something an anarchist would say. It would be quite the stretch to call that centrism, no?

      The person (I reckon) is rather talking about the inherent nature of a government being corrupt. The individual opinions of each government do not matter for this.

      • DonLongSchlong@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Ah, i also just edited my comment haha. Then the difference lies in us reading the comment differently. You would be correct in your interpretation of the comment, i do not see a reason why that interpretation would be less valid than mine either until comment OP clarifies their position

        • myrmidex@belgae.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Okay, I can agree to that conclusion :D

          At first I felt personally offended as I too regard all governments as untrustworthy, for which I’d be regarded as far-left, not (enlightened) centrist. But I see the discrepancy now :)