• Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    They can easily rejoin…

    Brother what? You clearly don’t know what you’re talking about, or you’re trolling.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      If they are existing members, they have already proven to fulfill the requirements. Hence it is theoretically easy for them to rejoin 🤷

      Having a system where existing states can regress on vital criteria that were necessary to join with no real risk of expulsion just creates a system of impunity that enables veto abuse.

      But clearly the problem isn’t the veto power, but that the system allows for such regression to happen in the first place.

      Removing the veto power just enables for that impunity to fester and destroy the EU from within.

      • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        “Theoretically easy” lol.

        Nothing in the EU is easy, especially with the Veto power.


        They will Veto anything that wants to remove them. So the EU will literally have to disband to kick them out.

        And if they wanted to rejoin, and the Veto was still in place, other countries would probably Veto them joining again.

        I’m genuinely unsure if you have no idea what you’re talking about, or if you’re trolling or misguided, the Veto power is a big issue in the EU and is to a degree destroying it, because the EU can’t act unless literally everyone agrees.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          The corresponding EU treaty article explicitly says that the country affected can’t veto it. Anything else would be obviously stupid.