I’m too lazy to read the court docs but I’ll just say this:
IF what you’re saying is true about the case being about a revenge porn case involving a (pretend) 19-year old girl, and the above commenters are claiming it as CSAM or sexting involving minors, then this is gross misinformation and you should not be downvoted so hard for calling it out.
I’m too lazy to read the court docs but I’ll just say this:
IF what you’re saying is true about the case being about a revenge porn case involving a (pretend) 19-year old girl, and the above commenters are claiming it as CSAM or sexting involving minors, then this is gross misinformation and you should not be downvoted so hard for calling it out.