return2ozma@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 2 个月前It's 2026, which tech did you realistically think we would have by now?message-squaremessage-square122linkfedilinkarrow-up187arrow-down12
arrow-up185arrow-down1message-squareIt's 2026, which tech did you realistically think we would have by now?return2ozma@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 2 个月前message-square122linkfedilink
minus-squareHazy@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-22 个月前The thing is, we could do that right now. But it’s more expensive and increases patient exposure to radiation and is just unnecessary. Right tool for the job, if it ain’t broke etc.
minus-squareagamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 个月前 if it ain’t broke Ironic choice of words
minus-squareHazy@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 个月前A deliberate sprinkling of irony helps me cope with existence
minus-squareagamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 个月前You and me both buddy, although “sprinkling” somewhat understates my general approach.
The thing is, we could do that right now. But it’s more expensive and increases patient exposure to radiation and is just unnecessary. Right tool for the job, if it ain’t broke etc.
Ironic choice of words
A deliberate sprinkling of irony helps me cope with existence
You and me both buddy, although “sprinkling” somewhat understates my general approach.