For anyone else wondering:

Navidrome is an open source web-based music collection server and streamer. It gives you freedom to listen to your music collection from any browser or mobile device. It’s like your personal Spotify!

Congrats on all the labor you saved.

If you think folks here are uniquely unreasonable you could try lemmy.world/c/selfhosted .

On the off chance that you truly don’t understand:

The nice thing to do would be to accept the feedback and add a short description. It’s confusing to others why you are staunchly opposed to performing that small courtesy, and instead jump to never posting here again.

So . . . not relevant to my comment?

By default you can use left and right bracket keys [] to adjust speed, and it should do adjustments to make the pitch sound the same.

To adjust the pitch alone, you can have something like this in your input.conf, customized as you like:

ALT+p af toggle @rb
ALT+UP af-command rb multiply-pitch 1.25
ALT+DOWN af-command rb multiply-pitch 0.8
ALT+LEFT af-command rb set-pitch 1.0

I haven’t looked at this in a long time. If you always need this there’s likely a conf option to always enable the “rubber band” (@rb) filter. And maybe other commands than multiply that would be better.

EDIT: Sorry, I don’t have this quite right. Maybe someone can correct me.

OK, I see some differences between your two screenshots, but what’s the relevance to my comment?

As described at https://docs.kde.org/stable5/en/kwin/kcontrol/windowbehaviour/index.html#titlebar-actions

Shade

Causes the window to be reduced to simply the titlebar.

I don’t know what I should be noticing there. I can’t see any text for the tool buttons along the left edge of the window.

Anyone notice non-obvious Wayland road blocks?

I think the last thing keeping me on X11 is window shade.

I have trouble with both, but more experience with GIMP. I can’t stand all the little tool buttons with no text. I want the name of each tool always visible on its button.

I have the same problem with Inkscape.

I’ve never had a Statamic site myself, didn’t know about it till this thread. I like site generators but don’t want to invest energy in ones that don’t handle colors very well. I don’t want to have to override colors, either as a user or developer, though I often do. For a an SSG anyway I want to be able to trust the tool to handle legibility.

I’m also terrible with HTML and CSS.

No. In addition to browsers’ prefers-dark-mode setting, there is also the fallback foreground and background color choice, used whenever a website does not specify a foreground or background color. One common case is when viewing a plain unstyled site or txt file.

A dark-mode preferring user might choose for these fallbacks a light foreground and dark background. The problem is then that some designers will carelessly specify either the foreground or background color (and not both), assuming that their choice will happen to have good contrast with every user’s browser preferences.

More low contrast examples from the Statamic docs:

In Firefox’s preferences page those settings are accessed with the “Manage Colors” button just below dark-mode selection, and look like this:

Notice that I am not overriding any colors specified by the page.

The main site isn’t made with Statamic?

Anyway the docs pages fail in certain parts, too, anyway:

FWIW Statamic (like many sites) fails my basic “is everything on the main site legible for dark-mode preferring users?” test:

wish I cluld have just the folders

You can copy or symlink folders around between themes in ~/.local/share/icons/.

Nice! So what/where is the color scheme?

ncspot is great, spotify-tui is another, and in the past I’ve had some success using mopidy-spotify and an mpd frontend (a discontinued but very cool one called Cantata).

Nice! Color schemes?

I didn’t downvote, and I’m not accusing you of anything.

Someone asked why anyone would downvote this. Many of us don’t know what waifu wallpaper stuff is about, but if I do an image search for waifu I see lots of young girl cartoon porn stuff, and I have heard of some folks calling their child-like sex pillow by that word.

So my answer is that those of us who don’t know what you’re talking about may have ideas from sources like that, and nothing in the post added explanation for this crowd. That may explain some downvotes.

FYI when I type “waifu” into Bing one of the suggestions is “waifu body pillow with hole.” And for “waifu is” the first suggestion is “waifu is for low lives.”

My point is you shouldn’t expect people who don’t know about it to understand it properly, when only casual familiarity content is full of stuff like that.

I’m not claiming all anime fans are anything in particular. I’m saying I don’t know what all the things mean, and thought that “waifu” might mean sex-with-pillow-child stuff. It probably doesn’t mean that, but people like me who know nothing about it might make that same mistake, which could explain some downvotes, which was my aim.