It’s publicly available in the ToS

Our Governing Laws

The website and the agreement will be governed by and construed per the laws of the following countries and/or states:

The Netherlands
Republic of Finland
Federal Republic of Germany

https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

!yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com

You won’t be the first to post there about that

On that regard, Beehaw have probably the most solid experience. Too bad that they kind of don’t want to update Lemmy anymore.

• https://joinfediverse.org/#federation
• https://jointhefediverse.net/?lang=en-us
• https://joinfediverse.wiki/Main_Page
• https://lemmy.world/post/24577309

https://feddit.org/post/6819084

I would really appreciate a “meta” feed and a “hobby communities” feed

Also being able to have memes split from the rest

Let’s get manual static user-defined multicommunities, and then let’s see for algorithm managed ones

https://piefed.social/ has “Topics” already

How much?

!onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone is a nice meme community

you could browse the community locally and across all other instance communities with the same name.

Lemmy.ml and lemmy.world political communities wouldn’t probably mix well together. There’s a reason different versions of communities exist. If they are two similar, they should consolidate on one community.

Right now, I suppose a workaround is to just direct message the instance admins the next time something like this occurs. I think this solution is far from ideal, though, since it is

Correct

I think this solution is far from ideal, though, since it is less obvious and could involve extra effort if there are multiple admins or moderators to send the report to.

Indeed, but this feature seems low on the priority list compared to multireddits or instance agnostic links

Good point

Agnostic links will be implemented in 0.20: https://feddit.org/post/5390705

The Fediverse is already difficult enough to get as it is, add key management to the mix and we’ll be a few hundreds instead of 42000 monthly active users

Sounds like a cool idea

!fedimemes@feddit.uk

I still don’t get how they want to evidence that as there’s still no relay today not operated by Bluesky where people can register.

A few people have mentioned experimenting with self hosting a relay in the other thread, but that still seems like early experimenting due to the lack of relays with open registrations

There is one aspect of this I feel mixed about: I don’t want folks to trust Bluesky, or believe in atproto, just because of the people on the team. Or because of our track record to date. Teams and individuals change over time, and we mean it seriously when we say “the company is a future adversary”. The bar we are shooting for is to convince people that atproto is legitimate and useful even if Bluesky and the team adopt the worst of intentions. We have a lot of work to earn that kind of trust in the protocol, but it will be all the more meaningful if the goalposts don’t move.

At least they acknowledge that.

Fediverse blueballing

Just posted on !fedimemes@feddit.uk