They’re the same picture.jpg

You mean

question vs not question

Noone was technically allowed to use it

There is your answer. draw.io can be used by everyone and for almost every purpose, so the situations aren’t even remotely the same.

currently being tested

They’ve been “testing” it for more than a decade at this point and even if Russia is able to actually bring the T-14 into service, they won’t be able to produce any significant number of them for the same reason their tank corps isn’t using many T-90M right now.

pure garbage

Go look up Operation Desert Storm and rethink what you wrote there.

If there’s anything here that’s garbage, it’s your notions about tank design.

more manoeuvrable

Ah yes, there’s nothing quite like a 4 km/h reverse speed. That’s a really tangible factor making the T-72 a better tank.

Who cares? They’re just pedestrians, it’s not like they’re honest car-driving citizens

~ 'murica

The link doesn’t explain what Taler is, you then also have to click through to the home page. How hard can it be to add literally a single sentence like

Taler is a payment system that makes privacy-friendly online transactions fast and easy.

it lacks features left and right

That’s a bummer. IMO, one of Nextcloud’s biggest advantages is that it bundles so much functionality into a single application.

Well yes, but it’s weird that the article mentions Web3 in particular.

One small correction: There is no EU office responsible for GDPR enforcement, the EU member states are responsible for handling GDPR breaches within their jurisdiction (Art. 51 GDPR). As an individual you can also file a complaint against offenders (Art. 77 GDPR).

There weren’t even any insults there, unless you think being a Lemmygrad user is one. Come to think of it, you may be onto something…

On a serious note: They’re also spreaing Russian propaganda about the war in Ukraine, which is enough to discredit them anyway. Did I say war? Of course I mean SpEcIaL MiLiTaRy fAiLuRe!

What you’re describing is business source, not open source. Hashicorp chose to use open source and thus allow other companies to compete. Nobody forced them to, they could’ve just kept Terraform as closed or business source from the beginning. There’s nothing wrong with doing so, only if you pull a bait and switch like Hashicorp did does it become a problem.

Funny to be reading this in an open source community. For one, the fork’s license is open source while Terraform’s is not. The impact is mostly on businesses, but open source has always been for everyone - including business.

Furthermore, Terraform’s new license is subject to interpretation and dynamic. It’s so hazy and unclear that they created an FAQ website which is essentially a binding addendum to the license that can be updated anytime as Hashicorp pleases. Is your business competing with Hashicorp? Who knows, only Hashicorp can decide that.

Edit: Clarified phrasing

Sounds like a “RAID is not a backup” situation.

identifying, stalking, and punishing malcontents

This is giving me strong 1984 vibes