It’s based on guessing what the actual worth of AI is going to be, so yeah, wildly speculative at this point because breakthroughs seem to be happening fairly quickly, and everyone is still figuring out what they can use it for.

There are many clear use cases that are solid, so AI is here to stay, that’s for certain. But how far can it go, and what will it require is what the market is gambling on.

If out of the blue comes a new model that delivers similar results on a fraction of the hardware, then it’s going to chop it down by a lot.

If someone finds another use case, for example a model with new capabilities, boom value goes up.

It’s a rollercoaster…

Ok that one wins

While not as imposing as its larger AT-AT Ducker cousin (picture missing in thread, which is a shame), the AT-ST Ducker nonetheless served as a significant addition to the Imperial side of battlefields in the Galactic Civil War.

How beep dapper beep boop

This is the stuff of nightmares. Love it

Homing duck brick

This is… Satisfyingly chonky

This duck is the terror of the 7 seas, harrr

Think of the poor shareholders!

Technically, isn’t this a different thing? Genuinely asking.

There could be a license that forbids use (sort of like the CC no commercial use license) but still allows the code to be reviewed publicly, no?

Because they didn’t come out saying they won’t enable ads. They just quietly renamed the toggle to say something else, and that is shady AF. Why are you trying to spin it positively?

This is hilarious stuff.

In a wonderful example of the importance of epeen, people in heated arguments over there have released classified documents just to prove they’re right.

You have a link here for leaked docs for a British Challenger II tank, but its not the only case.