Geo-centric orbits are a bit pricer and probably need something bigger than a cubesat…

I’m most surprised that they removed SMART tooling. My primary pool is still spinning rust for the foreseeable further. And I just retired a drive based on SMART testing and TrueNAS’s alerting.

Why not just link to the actual source? It gives more complete information anyway

• TrueNAS blog post
• TrueNAS docs Release notes

Man, I remember lusting over getting a WD Raptor back in the day. They were so much more expensive and lower data density it I couldn’t justify for my low budget.

As was already said, 160 was pretty common, think increments of 20 or 40 is what i remember. Raptor drives had kinda odd size increments compared to other consumer drives. Looks like it would be 36Gb circa 2003.

I once got some retired scsi drives. Man 10,000rpm drives were loud and hot…

Thanks for bringing back some old memories

Thank you! This project make so much more sense when put in context of Google+. Their landing page is so buzzwordy my eyes just glazed over and just couldn’t see what it’s actually trying to achieve.

Makes me wonder if there is self hosted project like Google Wave… and if that is a good idea…