He never stopped doing bad things, he just started rehabing his image

Why would he give a shit what people think about him? Others rich people don’t because when you’ve got enough money you can insulate yourself entirely from what the world thinks.

This is the most ridiculous line of reasoning.

Firstly, many rich people care. Many care about their “legacy”. They want their names on big donations, and on school campuses.

Secondly, many rich people spend inordinate amounts on PR advisement firms, demonstrating that there are significant dollar values put into caring about this. We’re talking about PR for the person, not even for a business.

Nor do the people judging him so harshly.

They judge from what is known. You judge from giving him the benefit of the doubt between the cracks.

The fuck? Why would he donate money and save countless lives just to benefit from it via some claimed business link?

This is such a bizarre misrepresentation of what my comment is clearly saying.

I am clearly pointing out that he is still doing evil and you are being blinded by some fancy curated numbers.

I don’t even know how you got to that conclusion.

I doubt you actually believe this, at least if we are understanding the words as written.

Just based on the website we are talking on, I am going to assume we have a few shared moral similarities, at least at a glance.

We think murder, rape, discrimination based on inalienable traits, domestic abuse, religious fanaticism, theft outside of exceptions are wrong.

If we start going down even that quickly thought up list, and just look at surveys from groups throughout the world, we start chunking massive percentages of people off of our “good” list very quickly.

These are nowhere near exact numbers because the point isn’t about any specific one of these, but about disqualifying behaviours and points of view.

Most people don’t murder, but many support it. Let’s just say we are only thinking about people who will murder at some point in their lives, and guesstimate that at 1% off the list.

99% good

Most people don’t rape… or do they? How many third world or religiously fanatic nations treat rape as standard, within marriages, on people of lower status, etc.

Even in western nations, the numbers of people who are sexually assaulted by people they know are more like 1 in [single digit number], and then further surveys always reveal that there is probably significant under-reporting going on, with many people unable to believe they were raped, told to be silent, and who ultimately rationalize away the event.

Now you go to countries with religious fanaticism, and many if not most condone rape in some fashion, especially spousal rape.

I would estimate, that the amount of people who rape, extremely roughly guesstimating, is around 1/10th the population, if not higher.

Some will overlap with the murderers of course, but this is just a thought experiment, and I already think this guess is on the low side, so lets move on.

89% good

Discrimination is where we start chunking hard. Even if you try to be charitable here, surveys show that even within western countries many are ok with and regularly discriminate against people for their inalienable traits. You go to poorer countries or countries with less stable situations and this gets even worse.

Lets just guesstimate that of the non overlaps, this takes 3/10 off the list, giving quite a bit of leeway to people with less blatant instances.

59% good

I could keep going but I hope you see the point I am making here and why I think that if just about anyone here sat down and truly pieced together what the average person was like, with whatever their personal list of disqualifiers from being a good person were, they would quickly come to the conclusion, that most people are not good, and could easily come to the conclusion that many were horrible, depending on what horrible meant in that context. Horrible doesn’t have to be saved for only hitler just because its not used for someone who steals a candy bar.

So many people have a very binary view of others, and Lemmy’s the same, as the downvoting shows.

What a ridiculous argument you’ve made here. The voting system is literally binary. No one can vote 7/10 on messaging, 4/10 on points.

Does this offset his earlier negative behaviour? I honestly think it might do.

This is exactly why hes done it. You don’t know what hes actually responsible for. You don’t see the pharmaceutical investments hes made, farmland he owns, or his bad takes (like recently suggesting that we should abandon the climate because he’s dipping his toes into the AI space).

You see some flashy figures and figure, well that must be a good guy!

Some “nuance” that is.

There is at least one Robo vac that does not rely on the cloud, and personally I can’t imagine feeling comfortable with a robovac being cloud connected for no reason.

At 1000 bucks you are dangerously close to a 9600 9060XT 16gb build, which would run circles around this performance wise.

There is no way its this expensive. It would be deader than a doornail on arrival.

If this thing isn’t 750 or less, itll be an impossible sell.

Id be fine with 600, a 50% increase, just to not be forced to use Meta software at all.

This is like the lie kids tell their parents every time its new PC time for back to school.

“I swear mom! The GPU is for school work!”

You don’t understand that billionaires are greedy?

I don’t get these naive responses.

You can understand when someone in your own class is greedy, but they get really rich and its suddenly a surprise?

Oh nowadays you can get 26tb drives pretty affordably, so a 4 bay NAS could be getting you 50TiB now.

Of course most people don’t need all that though… including me honestly but hey, that data isn’t going to collect itself.

pretty sure that’s meant in a light hearted fashion

Imagine not having a double digit bay NAS with triple digit Tebibytes of space.

Alternatively, your setup is kinda slow and you’re kinda lazy (not used pejoratively).

In what way? You don’t own anything on the fediverse. The people who run the various instances do.

Maybe they even have a TOS that says you own it, but then what? its still up to them to continue to host it, and they have no contract with you.

Unless you are self hosting your own instance, and only count what is on that, you own no more than with larger social media sites.

To be clear, I think that federations certainly are better than monolithic sources for a variety of reasons for real people, but they aren’t a solution for ownership.

The most important thing is to first have a governing body that governs the police, without being police.

Without this, nothing here matters because they haze, and brutalize those who do not conform to their awful internal group standards.

You can literally see what happens to good cops. They get forced out.

The problem with your post, is that you can’t help someone who does not want to be helped.

Ideally that type of person would be kicked out of the force, but instead they comprise of the majority of these forces.

Just to be clear, many if not most agencies have mandatory psych evals, visits etc after different types of incidents, but as you can see, they just don’t solve the problem.

But wont end as long as the biggest resistance they see is people making snarky self censored comments on mostly right wing billionaire owned social media.

They cannot.

The republican party is complicit, and supports the evil he does, and more than that, he commands their supporters, so it would be political suicide for them.

Why can’t the democrats? The republicans control all 4 parts of government and even if they had control over the senate, they would need 60% of the votes, a number that is unprecedented in recent times.