

You somehow replied to the wrong comment?
AuDHD cat


You somehow replied to the wrong comment?


That seems to be about the other list. The noqanon one.


| url | reason |
|---|---|
| aa.com.tr | Turkish state media |
| adele.pages.casa | LLM-generated posts |
| bild.de | A tabloid that has been unfavourably compared to The Sun, and is considered generally unreliable. |
| browsergate.eu | AI slop |
| caixinglobal.com | LLM-generated posts |
| chainalysis.com | LLM-generated posts |
| coindesk.com | Crypto boosters |
| counterpunch.org | Not always reliable. |
| dailysabah.com | Turkey govt properganda |
| dailystar.co.uk | Tabloid |
| electronicintifada.net | Unreliable source |
| english.news.cn | Ok except about anything to do with China |
| eurasiantimes.com | Unreliable source |
| forbes.com | Anyone can write a forbes article. Check the byline to determine whether an article is written by a “Forbes Staff” member, “Contributor”, “Senior Contributor”, or “Subscriber”. |
| fullstackpm.tech | slop |
| gbnews.com | Unreliable source |
| hispantv.com | Unreliable source |
| houseofsaud.com | AI-written posts |
| journal-neo.su | Russian propaganda outlet |
| marathonhandbook.com | AI |
| metro.co.uk | Unreliable source |
| ndtv.com | Modi propaganda. Check MBFC |
| nerds.xyz | AI-written articles |
| news.cgtn.com | Chinese govt propaganda source |
| newsus.cgtn.com | Chinese govt propaganda source |
| nycjournals.com | fake news |
| nypost.com | Unreliable source |
| peoplesdispatch.org | Promotes Marxist-Leninist perspectives |
| plenglish.com | Cuba state media |
| presstv.ir | Iranian state tv |
| rawstory.com | Often inflammitory and kinda biased |
| republicworld.com | Unreliable source |
| sixthtone.com | Singapore govt source |
| tasnimnews.com | Iranian state tv |
| techtimes.com | LLM-generated posts |
| techtrenches.dev | LLM-generated posts |
| telesurenglish.net | Propaganda news channel directly sponsored by the governments of Venezuela and Cuba |
| telesurtv.net | Bolivarian propaganda outlet |
| thatprivacyguy.com | LLM-generated posts |
| theamericanconservative.com | A self-identified “opinionated source” whose factual accuracy has been questioned |
| theintercept.com | |
| the-sun.com | Trash tabloid |
| united24media.com | Factual, but still state-aligned advocacy journalism |
| vgchartz.com | Unreliable source |
| wheresyoured.at | The author of this blog works for AI companies https://www.baldurbjarnason.com/2025/use-the-tools-of-the-job-youve-chosen/#the-unguarded-flank |
| writings.hongminhee.org | LLM generated posts |


Last I looked it’s a check for if your comment is just this
Edit: yes


You have mp4 selected in the recording format, vp9 is not supported in mp4 as far as i can tell, if you change it to matroska (mkv) does it then work?
Edit: I just opened OBS and checked the settings, it will say “(Incompatible with [insert format])” so that’s not it.


Very interesting, I should read it sometime (aka never, as if I am currently reading anything)


To my knowledge, the DPRK is the only socialist country that has implemented direct elections at all levels. Neither the Soviet Union (in its time) nor China have embraced a complete system of direct elections
Since it is only a short excerpt, there may be some context missing. Or I may be misinterpreting it, I am putting particular importance on “complete,” there is some thing that the USSR didn’t do that makes him consider it not complete? But it seems to me to be incorrect, the soviets did have direct elections after the 1936 constitution?
Instead of a Congress of delegates electing an Executive Committee, the supreme authority of every territory in the U.S.S.R. will now be a directly elected Supreme Soviet or Council. The citizens will directly elect their deputies not only to the local Soviet, but to the provincial and district Soviets, to the Supreme Council of their Republic, and to the Supreme Council of the U.S.S.R., which will replace the Congress of Soviets and the Central Executive Committee
Soviet Democracy


The GDR coat of arms or the WPK emblem are nice variations
![]()
![]()
Quills have been used in a bunch of variations. Cogwheels too


Where do you dumb fucks get this shit from?
Keep on making shit up you dumb ass.
Modlog strikes again.


I think Lumelore is starting of at anti-communism, and working her way from there. It leads to some weird stuff like this.


It says that anyone could propose a candidate, and that the person elected in that specific election wasn’t part of the [Communist] Party, making it somewhat likely they weren’t a communist.
But a better question, is why is it important that they can vote for non-communists? What else should they vote for? Fascists? Liberals that wish to destroy the Soviet system and institute capitalism, thereby making the lives of the vast majority of people worse? Chapter XVII goes over this to some extent, but I of course do recommend reading the entire book.


No mention of being able to vote for non-communists
???
Anybody present had the right to propose a candidate, the one who was elected was not personally a member of the Party


I have, while working in the Soviet Union, participated in an election. I, too, had a right to vote, as I was a working member of the community, and nationality and citizenship is no bar to electoral rights. The procedure was extremely simple. A general meeting of all the workers in our organization was called by the trade union committee, candidates were discussed, and a vote was taken by show of hands. Anybody present had the right to propose a candidate, and the one who was elected was not personally a member of the Party. In considering the claims of the candidates their past activities were discussed, they themselves had to answer questions as to their qualifications, anybody could express an opinion, for or against them, and the basis of all the discussion was: What justification had the candidates to represent their comrades on the local Soviet?
As far as the elections in the villages were concerned, these took place at open village meetings, all peasants of voting age, other than those who employed labour, having the right to vote and to stand for election. As in the towns, any organization or individual could put forward candidates, anyone could ask the candidate questions, and anybody could support or oppose the candidature. It is usual for the Communist Party to put forward a candidate, trade unions and other organizations can also do so, and there is nothing to prevent the Party’s candidate from not being elected, if he has not sufficient prestige among the voters.


The name actually came from British communists that supported the USSR sending tanks into Hungary in '56.
You can select more than one language in the settings.
I think without anything selected it will show you all languages? And when you select some it will only show you those languages? That is what my test just showed