👍

I respect your nuanced takes. I wish there were more on the fediverse with your mindset and calm approach to conversation.

I feel like you picked out those examples while ignoring the ones where i have acted in good faith

We don’t cite Gramsci here

These people are liberals as well

Linking to the general page for liberalism instead of classical liberalism when talking about right wingers… huh sloppy

Go through my comment history and you’ll see that the dog-piling on people with wrong think very much exists

This place def needs more centrists. Too many libs sucking themselves (and each other) off. Not more MAGA though. Those guys are just wrong

smd mlite

I don’t know what to say

Genuine question: What’s so fascinating about it? I’ve tried unironically listening to it, but there’s just no melody to latch onto; I wonder how one can enjoy it

The noise genre

This is cringe. Not even because you’re reading Marx, but because you assume the person you’re reading it to is intelligent enough to understand what you’re reading

This is ml ofc it won’t be removed

Cuz boobs

Who’s ‘our’?

I guess so. The possibility of governments having the ability to use that information for their own agendas in the first place might be cause for concern. Probably the best argument for caring about privacy

Not necessarily. Your example about the journalist just clarifies why we have the concept of “threat models”. She had a threat model that required some level of privacy. I just don’t have that as with most people

🤨. You’re calling me selfish because i don’t care about something? Your privacy is your business man. My decisions shouldn’t have to dictate how that’s handled

I still don’t care. There’s a difference if they’re going to use this info to exploit me, but if they aren’t doing that, i couldn’t give less of a fuck what they think about my sexting

What are you saying? Ammo doesn’t finish in TV world