To prevent the script from spreading further, all Wikimedia projects were set to read-only for about 2 hours, and all user JavaScript was temporarily disabled.

The NoScript extension in Firefox makes the web so much nicer. It turns out sites that don’t require JavaScript tend to made by vastly better humans than sites that do. More so for sites that require cross-site scripting and cookies to just show text.

Can’t search on google.com without allowing JavaScript, but it turns out Lite.DuckDuckGo does, and for me at least gives vastly better search results.

Wikipedia can be read and edited without allowing JavaScript, and I personally don’t like the crap that the scripts provide. It’s also usable without cookies, tho the idiotic UI options column on the right is a hassle without cookies.

If Firefly is about the little people, then Serenity is about James Bond.

Lots of people liked Serenity, but I think it was like a studio-made sequel: more, bigger, more, for no good reason.

Yeah Firefly is amazing, even for people who don’t normally like its genres. Avoid the movie Serenity tho.

Occupied, a Norwegian show about Norway trying to stop being a petrostate.

Already mentioned: Chernobyl, Deadwood (avoid its movie), Six Feet Under (the finale is amazing).

• Nina Simone - “Strange fruit” Invidious (which I prefer to the Billie Holiday versions)

Honorable mentions:

• The killers - “Goodnight, travel well” Invidious
• Maiya Sykes, Postmodern jukebox - “Boulevard of broken dreams” Invidious
• The rolling stones - “Paint it, black” Invidious

You failed to explain how you plan to abolish the two party system that makes voting “green” unviable in the US.

There are enough people who couldn’t stomach voting for the Rs or Ds, to vote for another party that wants to reverse instead of accelerate anthropogenic climate change. See post you replied to:

In 2020 Biden got 81 million votes, Trump 74 million. 84 million didn’t vote - if they voted Green to reverse anthropogenic climate change, they could’ve gotten a non-omnicidal president, won the house, and a third of the senate.

Not to mention Jill Stiens [sic] ties to Putin.

If Stein is tied to Putin, then another 3rd party should get people’s votes instead - the smaller parties have less ballot access, requiring more write-in votes. What are Stein’s connections? Seems like the SIC’s report doesn’t make it clear what she did wrong.

It’s not only Republicans voting to have their faces eaten, per the definition of this community: https://lemmy.world/post/21640658

Democrats constantly vote to make the biosphere unlivable as shown by how their actions are accelerating anthropogenic climate: like the US producing more oil under Biden than under Trump. Cue surprised Pikachu when their houses burn down due to record heat, record wind storms, record fires which climate scientists have been warning about for decades now.

You can vote for the omnicidal Democrats who supply weapons to genocidal governments, or vote for the omnicidal Republicans who are worse than the Democrats, or you can vote to reverse climate change. In 2020 Biden got 81 million votes, Trump 74 million. 84 million didn’t vote - if they voted Green to reverse anthropogenic climate change, they could’ve gotten a non-omnicidal president, won the house, and a third of the senate.

71.0% of voters in LA county voted for Biden, and 26.9% voted for Trump in 2020.

Under Biden, oil production hit a new record high, beating even Trump’s record.

So instead of voting Green to reverse anthropogenic climate change, the vast majority instead voted for parties that accelerate it.

The role of climate change in the catastrophic 2025 Los Angeles fires.