Huh interesting point. I suppose my view of it was closer to “Should I eat X? Probably not, NutriScore says it’s bad” and that’s where my disagreement came from. Your logic actually gives it much more sense.

Wonder how many people drew the same conclusions as me when looking at it for the first time. First psichological impact is important.

English because even though I can understand the post, my French is not nearly good enough to articulate this point

I’m Italian, as you might now we are the only big EU country to have opposed Nutri-Score thus far.

This summer I spent my holidays in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region and while shopping there I got the chance of interacting firsthand with the score, as someone not used to it.
In many occasions looking at the score and then at the ingredient list made very little sense, in particular some decently healthy food was often marked with harsh scores for reasons I couldn’t quite understand. An example of this I remember quite well was a bottle of fruit juice that had a score of D. Sure, it probably has lots of sugar, but it also contained decent quantities of fruits. I thought that was supposed to be a good thing.

I don’t think this score is the way to go, honestly. I’m a big fan of the work the EU is doing in terms of food safety but this just isn’t the right way to go in my opinion. The indicator is way too simplistic and while the algorithm behind it is pretty clear, sometimes you end up with weird results that to me make very little sense.

That wasn’t really what I was paying attention to the last time I looked at the logs but going off memory no, you can’t.

The Lemmy logs are very privacy friendly which is good most of the times but a tragedy when someone posts illegal stuff to your instance and you have no way of tracking them down.

Yes! When setting a removal rule for a post or a comment, you can fill an optional message field. After having removed the content, the bot will reply to the user with whatever you have written there.

Relevant pages from the docs:

• Comments
• Posts

For real. Small instances ftw. Glad you enjoy my tool. Investigating blocked communities might be a feature for a future upgrade, thanks for the idea.

I haven’t followed it thoroughly as I’m not particularly interested with the hexbear content, I think they opened federation (but only on allowlist) but as soon as they did so many of the big instances said “fuck no” and immediately defederated them. This includes lemmy.world, feddit.de, beehaw.org, lemmy.ca … list goes on.

• Lemmy.world announcement on the topic.
• List of instances that defederated hexbear: https://defed.xyz/check/hexbear.net

What’s really a problem is whitelisting.

Agreed. Fortunately very few instances rely on that. The only decently big one is hexbear.net, the second biggest both of our instances are barred from has 41 active users and all the others have only a single digit of active users. Not that big of a loss.

Data for your instance: https://defed.xyz/check/eviltoast.org

That’s a fair concern. You can check the data for yourself on the awesome-lemmy-instances repository; alternatively I have made this tool to make the search more interactive and user friendly: defed.xyz.

Short answer to your question is: 410 is a lot. They are the second instance for number of defeds, only beaten by feddit.dk. Most big instances tend to have between 30 and 50 blocks, with the notable exception of sh.itjust.works which has only 5.

To give credit where credit is due, few of the instances blocked by beehaw actually run Lemmy and even fewer are active (2 or more monthly active users). This doesn’t change the fact that it’s a BIG number.

edit: pinging @Cube6392@beehaw.org as this partially answers their question.

I feel like they are near the Orange LibLeft quadrant: a liberal that actually ends up behaving in a somewhat authoritarian manner in enforcing their beliefs onto others for the sake of safety, diversity and so on.

Both beehaw and their admins are great and at the end of the day the beauty of the fediverse is that everyone can run their instance as they please. I just wish there was another way to fix this sort of probems without having to block 5k+ people from accessing your website.

I am gonna give a hot-take, but we need more conservative on the fediverse

100% agree. And no, this doesn’t mean Trump supporters. In fact it doesn’t even mean anything close to the American right. Other countries have reasonable and functioning centre-right parties and I’d love to have something like that on Lemmy.

It’s up now. Not terribly active, unfortunately, but I love that someone had the dedication of creating one. And, as I said the meme, their theme is lovely.

I agree. I think relying too heavily on blocklists can be a detriment to the growth and decentralization of the Fediverse. Who even decides what ends up on them? Maybe you pass through the crossair of whoever handles that while they’re having a bad day and boom, you’re barred out of 2/3 of all the content.

Thanks for sharing! I see it takes a few ms to load the thumbnail but it’s a worthy tradeoff if it saves that much in storage. I’ll save this post and come back to your PR once it gets merged in, too lazy to apply it myself. :)

Holy shit, alright, I think I might be interested in this. I also have a growing storage problem that would need to solve. How does a patched instance look? Do you still see thumbnails? Can you share a screenshot?

What’s the use case for this? Reducing storage usage?

@infamousbelgian@waste-of.space @Mane25@feddit.uk both changes have been pushed and deployed, thank you for your feedback.

Noted, adding a forced .toLowerCase(). I’m implementing all of the feedback I’ve received thus far right now.

Uh yeah that is true. This was a one afternoon project, so I kinda threw the frontend together without thinking too much of it. I guess truncating the protocol instead of relying on the users doing it makes sense.

Oh I forgot about this community. Thank you for spreading the word.