Not really; usually when something doesn’t work as you like on Windows youre SOL…

If they’re used to chase down people the general public doesn’t like, it might even be applauded.

Efficient yes, but humanoid robots are much more likely to be accepted by the general public.

Have you considered that the down votes are because your comment adds nothing to the discussion except ragebait?

Even better when it also does “emergency avoidance” and sends you right into guardrails or oncoming traffic. That happens only once to you unwanted during the lifetime of the car and you immediately turn that shit off forever.

There should be a ceiling with patents, where if you make 10x back of what it cost your r&d (or whatever 5x of your yearly revenue), the patent should just be considered expired no matter how much time passed.

It should never be an infinite source of money.

I mean that you would have to test yourself. To me it seems like AI funnily enough has the same issues as humans, and that’s that it works worse in legacy codebases full of tech debt, and in large monoliths.

But it can still be an invaluable tool.

Indeed the more skilled you are the more infuriating it becomes when it does the dumbest shit.

It can write code decently well and fast, and is amazing at finding stuff in a large project.

But you still 100% need to verify what it does and truly understand it.

Personally, I think a moral company would offer permanent discounts to long term customers, but there isn’t a single company on earth I’m aware of that actually does that.

JetBrains do it with their IDE subscriptions, they give you a massive discount if you’re subscribed for a few years, and even time on stuff like their educational license counts towards that. Super refreshing to see.

OpenAI literally has Google connectors to work with your documents. This is meaningless.

It can still be pretty difficult to jump ship for any large corporation, but yeah there’s certainly harder things.

I mean if you write malware “for a good cause” plenty of people will rightfully judge you for subverting their expectations, and the reasoning doesn’t matter thst much. And it’s not like they’re completely in the wrong either.

…but do yoz “understand libraries” by reading every line of their code, or by reading the documentation? And only in the parts you’re actually interested in?

deleted by creator

Commissions are perfectly fine as long as they’re upfront about the price and it’s not percentage based. Then you basically just pay for a service / someone’s time.

And title.search is a problem with the government… Civilized countries have national registries of who exactlx owns what, and in the best ones you can freely look it up online, too.

There are tens of millions of tech jobs, the vast, vast majority of which is doing boring stuff like running the websites you visit.

…and then in their free time some create platforms like the one you’re on roght now, for free. So the generalization you made therr isn’t that appreciated.

It’s a stupid misdirection. What should be celebrated is the achievement and the trajectory they’re on. This is as if the US finally took renewables seriously, reached at least the global average, and people were like “it doesn’t matter because there are countries that do a 100%”. No - context absolutely does matter.

Hate is maybe the wrong word, but they’re certainly naturally opposed to it. Like a fish is naturally opposed to living on land. It doesn’t hate the land, but if it gets to decide you don’t get any.

Besides their pipelines being miles better, they never wete that great of an alternative.