The other is giving a fuck about users and not only about their vision.

And I know it is their project and they can do whatever they want but it’s my opinion and I dont like it.

Thanks, the Grampa here are learning.

https://cdn.memegenerator.es/imagenes/memes/full/22/28/22288955.jpg

But they probably have a graphic that show a point up, this is all a CEO needs to change something like this. Specially now they are IBM

SPOOOOOILER

Because I’m not comfortable using a tool of a mega corporation trying to shape the internet to show more ads to ppl

https://veloren.net/ is a voxel MMO and it is already very playable

If you are not dealing with a legacy project, windows server is the definition is insanity. Even projects that still use windows server usually use in a VM running on Linux.

Well, I agree that it is absurd, but it is nothing new

Technically you can, but no at least mediocre framework supports it, for the thread context it seems just bike shading

Nick from The Linux Experiment youtube channel made a video recently talking about that, for him and for me it’s clear that this quote:

software developed or supplied outside the course of a commercial activity should not be covered by this Regulation

means that any open source that gets any work from paid personnel from a company interested in the project in any commercial activity is covered by the regulation.

Here is the timestamp of his argument, I’m not from EU so I have no idea how this kind of idea could be implemented, but the text seems clear to me and seems bad.

If that is the case projects would be obligated to reject contributions from any companies.