Did Google create this standard? I’m just not sure why they’re being mentioned. It’s like saying your email account is “Gmail compatible”.

Matrix is pretty rough, in many ways.

What does “Google Authenticator compatible” mean?

The app doesn’t fit the OSI open source definition since you cannot modify and redistribute it.

And how do you communicate with the Pi0?

Element X is just a Matrix client.

https://selfh.st/apps/?tag=Blog

It’s a nice article and it’s good to see you adopted automatic Docker installation but…you wrote an article about self-hosting, and then published it on…Medium…?

100%. Not to mention being slow as hell.

We all use Signal already for messaging but it just doesn’t fulfill our screenshare needs.

…why not?

Most important feature it needs is the ability to screenshare with system audio, such as for streaming games or watching videos.

It has that. Have you tried their videoconferencing feature?

Other than that you can use one of a million Jitsi instances (Element has a publicly available one). Personally I use MiroTalk.

I prefer the LS1

Jesus fuck, these are like 90% AI apps.

Everyone uses Immich now 🤣

deleted by creator

This isn’t really a security issue as much as it is a DDOS issue.

Imagine you own a brick and mortar store. And periodically one thousand fucking people sprint into your store and start recording the UPCs on all the products, knocking over every product in the store along the way. They don’t buy anything, they’re exclusively there to collect information from your store which they can use to grift investors and burn precious resources, and if they fuck your shit up in the process, that’s your problem.

This bot just sits at the door and ensures the people coming in there are actually shoppers interested in the content of some items of your store.

You could skip the detour through hashes/electricity and do something with a proof-of-stake cryptocurrency, and just pay for access. The site owner actually gets compensated instead of burning dead dinosaurs.

Maybe if the act of transferring crypto didn’t use a comparable or greater amount of energy…

Open-Source-Software builds the foundations of digital infrastructure in big parts - in administration, economy, science and daily life. Even the current coalition agreement of the Federal Government mentions Open-Source-Software as a fundamental building block for the achievement of digital sovereignty.

However, the work done by thousands of volunteers for this goal is not recognised as volunteering, neither fiscally nor in terms of funding. This imbalance between societal importance and legal status has to be corrected.

Therefore, as an active contributor to Open-Source-Projects, I call for work on Open-Source to be recognised as volunteering for the common good – of equal rank as volunteer work for associations, youth work or ambulance service.

I remember when OEMs just didn’t rape you on RAM and storage.

One corporation DDOS’s your server to death so that you need the other corporations’ protection.

I’m not going to buy it but I think it’s awesome 😃