

10·
2 days agothat argument doesn’t hold. you’re letting perfect be the enemy of good-and if you truly believe that, then you wouldn’t be recommending Matrix which has web clients, see https://app.element.io/


that argument doesn’t hold. you’re letting perfect be the enemy of good-and if you truly believe that, then you wouldn’t be recommending Matrix which has web clients, see https://app.element.io/


why? because it would be cool if only intended recipients are able to view sent messages.


Check out CryptPad.org, it’s:
Only downsides so far is that the UX is a bit slow when first loading documents and there are no mobile apps.
EDIT: Forgot to add the important par, they recently added support for OnlyOffice in the browser, which to me, was a pretty big deal.


Bought a 20 TB external for ~$270 a few months ago. It’s now $400:


Can I coin the term imagineomics?
That doesn’t preclude fediverse clients from enabling E2EE. A web-client isn’t a requirement.
Agreed, nobody should trust twitter, but I would trust most mastodon clients to send encrypted messages, if/when implemented correctly. Does it guarantee that messages will never be read? No, but it does an extra layer that wasn’t there before.