They were an issue because it was the wild West and any app could keylog any other app and respond to anything. Now we actually have UX around this.

Just one year? It’s been working much longer for me.

XDG Global shortcuts portal? Has existed and been supported by plasma and gnome for a while https://flatpak.github.io/xdg-desktop-portal/docs/doc-org.freedesktop.portal.GlobalShortcuts.html

In addition to what everyone else said, I’ll tell you why I don’t think that what we have currently can become some runaway superhuman intelligence:

All “AI” people are talking about are basically “just” LLM wrappers: tools built to run a LLM in a loop while giving it access to the ability to write and run code. This gets pretty powerful, since you can do a lot programmatically (including monetary transactions), but has a fundamental limit:

LLMs are trained ahead of time. And that’s a very cost intensive, long process. Beyond that, the LLM has only a context window of finite length. So there are no long-term planning capabilities. While running after being trained, the LLM can only condense knowledge into a summary and then re-read it, a lossy process that might introduce mistakes in “understanding” and will make any prolonged task degrade over time.

And even if they figure out how to make the things actually self-modify and learn things, you can’t give every session that ability, since that’ll vastly increase the storage and performance requirements. Do sessions with that ability will be closely monitored and limited.

So I don’t see any space where an evil AI could emerge, even when factoring in an essential possible future improvement to the technology.

You gotta admit that’s a huge market.

Adb will continue to work

Yeah exactly: this is a thread where I said that kids drinking non-alcoholic beer is fine. What you just said agrees with me here, so I’m glad I made my point.

That’s how you’re writing a regex validator that’s almost always correct!

def is_regex_valid(p: Pattern | str, purpose_description: str):
    return False

There’s no deception: <0.05 rounds to the two significant digits 0.0 (0.050001 would round to 0.1)

It’s impossible to have absolutely no alcohol in something that had sugar and living micro-organisms in it at any point: e.g. fruits and therefore juice have alcohol.

That why you don’t need to label anything with less than 1.2% alcohol. You can only be sure that something has less when it says 0.0% or „alkoholfrei“.

No, you should have guessed Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Hamburg, or Sachsen, which have higher per capita alcohol consumption than Bavaria.

Very much this.

Yeah, and 0,0% beer in Germany can have up to 0,04999…% alcohol while unlabeled anything may have up to 1.2% (fruit juice often has like 0.3% or so)

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alkoholfrei

You’re confusing „ohne Alkohol“/0.0% beer with „alkoholfrei“/“non-alcoholic” beer.

In Germany, drinks only have to be labeled as alcoholic from 1.2% upwards, so

• unlabeled fruit juice may have up to 1.2% (has more likely 0.3% or so)
• alkoholfrei may have up to 0.5%
• 0,0 may have 0,0% (rounded down from up to 0,04999…%)

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alkoholfrei

Hahaha what weird corner do you live in? Completely unbelievable in Bavaria.

Not saying that I like the drinking culture here, but you’re not describing the reality here.

I drink non-alcoholic beer because I like the flavor of beer.

there’s no quantity of alcohol that does zero damage

There’s also no non-alcoholic fruit juice, so you should be all for 0% beer, which has less alcohol than any carton of apple juice you can buy.

So apple juice, bananas, …?

German here. I’m absolutely flabbergasted that this incomprehensible opinion has 20 upvotes.

0% alcohol is 0% alcohol. What the fuck are you talking about?

Thanks, good to know! Drama be drama-ing if you don’t have a good governance model …

Goddamn why more churn? The fuck is wrong with ReVanced?

Hey, I sucked making matplotlib plots before LLMs existed.