I suppose I’d duck.
I suppose I’d duck.
I’ll check it out (as soon as I need it).
I think as things scale people may start to appreciate just how hard it is to moderate content to a useful degree. Not too much. Not too little. (I’m not suggesting that any of the main sites has really gotten it right, but when it’s gone (at scale) things go bad fast (RIP Twitter).
I hope for better interoperability between platform (fedi) but it’s likely a pipe dream.
Last time I used gimp was in the late 90s I think. I gather it’s pretty much the same as when I last tried…?
I’ve found Krita to be pretty good (though I can load slowly on slow machines).
No idea - it was a bone fide great comment.
Thank you! Unfortunate that it’s missing from the App now, but at least there’s a workaround for browser folk.
I noticed this too… Same question.
You are correct, but I find dialing an easy-on-the-eyes colour and a good font reduces eye strain. It lets me keep the font size small with less fatigue especially as my eyes (and I) age.
As for what theme? Usually it’s as simple as browsing through the presets until one jumps out. Takes a few seconds. Having more presets adds about 2 seconds to the process and often (not always!) results in an even better choice. Have no idea the name of the theme I end up with.
Besides, tweaking this can be fun if you’re between thoughts - you end up learning the inner workings of the environment.
They really look nice. A good font makes a huge difference.
RSS is the way.
I just wish major newspapers would keep their feeds up to date. Toronto Star, for instance, does not. And yet it posts to vulture social media while complaining about how they are being picked clean… Just silly.
I use RSS for newspapers mostly. Good way to get a bead on what’s being reported chronologically as opposed to being explicitly sorted after the fact by outrage quotient.
Mastodon has a feature that lets you do a timed mute for a given source (ie - you can put a 2 week mute on an annoying meme feed that’s having an overzealous ‘moment’). I think this could be a fantastic feature for lemmy…
Thank you!
deleted by creator
A desktop application that does a great job as a non-destructive photo editor is found easily in darktable (and others). A mobile application that does a great job as a non-destructive photo editor is found easily in other apps. Unfortunately, they are not the same app/ecosystem.
Lightroom’s secret sauce is that they have the same app (or rather ecosystem) that handles both cases. You can take pics on mobile, edit them on mobile or desktop seamlessly. And you can import on desktop and edit on mobile. All originals go to desktop (LR Classic) for safe backup (using your own system/storage). I can peruse/edit/maintain my catalog/albums from any device (ie via smartphone if I’m waiting for my kids away from home…)
It is for this reason that I pay Adobe. Grudgingly.
I don’t care about the AI/fancy editing stuff Adobe has - it’s a distraction from the real requirement (well, for me, at least!)
I have never come across a Linux-capable (let alone FOSS) setup that can do this. Personally I think it’s very unlikely to ever happen as a FOSS setup as this requires an enterprise level design that, frankly, requires money to be done reliably. (I’m not knocking the amazing past, present and future accomplishments in FOSS-land - this just needs an approach that does not typically lend itself to FOSS).
I sincerely hope I’m wrong.
I’d gladly pay for an full solution based in Linux that can do what Adobe can do here. But it doesn’t seem to exist.
In the meantime, I keep kicking the darktable tires to see if there’s a path forward for me.
Yes - it certainly is weaker than the desktop (classic) LR, but it matches the mobile app quite well (and syncs to the desktop). This is the secret sauce. I can do simple smartphone pics, edit them and they will merge with main catalog. I can further refine on desktop (or vice versa) and it all syncs, and my originals stay with the desktop (the further backed up via whatever mechanism I want).
I applaud the idea of interoperability for the FOSS applications, but pulling this particular feat (the use case I describe above) off is non-trivial and requires enterprise level architecture and coordination. It’s a very different type of challenge than making a great non-destructive editor with local organization. I don’t mind paying for this sort of thing, but I wish it was officially offered in Linux-land. Wine is great (if it works) but it injects a substantial risk of breaking as applications get updated.
Would love to run Linux everywhere, but there needs to be official support from some key companies for that to happen. It’s a difficult thing for them to justify (rightly or wrongly). I don’t think open-source alone will solve things. Unfortunately…
Oh well - I got off topic here. But I was toying with trying another switch to Linux just this weekend and this is front of mind…
I’m interested to see how this project turns out.
Honestly, Adobe is is one of two main reasons I have not had success switching (back) to Linux. The secret sauce with Adobe Lightroom (Classic and CC) is the ability to take pics from any device (phone, old DSLR w/manual imports, downloads) and edit from my phone, or desktop seamlessly regardless of source, all in same catalogue, with non-destructive edits sync’d bidirectionally. I also get all originals sync’d tho main computer to merge in with my overall backup strategy. None of the open source offerings have this, though I keep checking in on it every few years. I’m sure Darktable is great - it may even be better than LR, but without the easy interoperability/synchronization, it’s not viable in my situation. I would not expect a solution like this to be free. I’m happy to pay for it. If Adobe offered real Linux compatibility, I’d pay for it in a heartbeat (and would gladly switch to a different company if it existed).
For video other graphic stuff, I can live with the silos and happily run Shotcut (or KDENLive) and Krita.
If it wasn’t for my other windows dependency, I’d switch and get by with running Lightroom virtually, and put up with the loss of other applications/features (on the Linux host) that I can live without.
(My other dependency is NI Maschine (music production). The hardware - and the feature set I’ve paid for and use simply won’t run on Linux. I briefly considered running it virtually in Windows but ended up giving my head a shake because of the Rube Goldberg machine I’d end up making to have anywhere close to the functionality I have now).
I’d be thrilled to switch back to Linux (I used it for years as a daily driver).
For us, it’s “Paying bills” == “Paying bills”…
Etobicoke. Can that count?
23.5 in day and 22.5 at night. For summer, at least. I realized too much AC really affects my joints. Too little is unbearable. Humans are a fickle bunch…
Might for 22.5 day 21.5 night for winter.
Adobe lightroom (with its multi-device editing and catalogue management - even when only using its cloud for smart previews).
Hardware support for music. NI Maschine is a non-starter. Most other devices are, at best, a ‘hope it works’ but are most definitely unsupported.
Music software. You can hack your way into getting a lot of your paid modules to work, but it is certainly not supported.
Wine is ‘fun’(?), but it’s a game of whack-a-mole chasing windows’ tail and will never allow everything to run. Either way it’s not 'supported.
Businesses any any size tend to eschew SW/HW that doesn’t have formal support. (things like RHEL are most definitely supported as servers and orgs certainly leverage it).
I keep installing Linux hoping I can get a sufficient amount stuff to work “well enough” to move on from windows but it’s just not to be (yet). Hope it changes, but it’ll require buy-in from commercial product developers. I hope as Linux continues to grow a foothold in desktop installs, a critical mass will be reached, commercial devs take notice and it’ll be easier to switch.
For now, I’m stuck with Windows and WSL. (But I am not happy with Windows’ direction).