Sure, I can accept that.

I don’t particularly have an opinion on artist compensation vs listener freedom when it comes to this. Obviously, I would prefer artists were paid what they deserve, but I don’t like participating in the fallacy that the end user is ethically responsible for the bullshit music industry infrastructure not paying artists properly.

I give where I can, but I’m just some person.

I think like this solution the best.

Not if you’re buying them 2nd hand on eBay, which would represent the bulk of building a collection.

To be clear, im not trying to detract from the effort, it’s just op mentioned artists not getting paid what they deserve.

Legal, yes. Supports the artist? No.

That thing about docker being so badly behaved in unprivileged containers seems to be a proxmox problem, not an LXC problem, as I’ve discovered running LXC in a non-proxmox environment.

Same here. I used proxmox for 8 years and have recently dumped it in favour of a couple of incus machines running OCI and LXC containers.

Much lighter, much faster, and to be honest, more straightforward when it comes to storage abstraction, which I think proxmox does in a very… convoluted way.

You can create a canonical name (CNAME) record to point to your old domain, you don’t need to recreate the LE if you don’t want to.

Assuming I understood your scenario, Canonical name record pointing one DNS name to another domain, then recreate your letsencrypt on the host.

“18% of car owners don’t know their brake fluid DOT rating.”

Makes sense, thank you.

Looks great, and I’m fully supportive of this.

However, I can’t understand the use case, and the part I can’t wrap my head around is why the server part is required… What differentiates pinepods from, say, antennapod from a functional standpoint?

I thought I was being clear that I have audited some of the scripts. They are built referencing other scripts instead of functions, and these rely on URLs. It’s difficult to follow.

Don’t ask chatgpt to audit code.

Have you ever looked at what was once ttek scripts? They’re a spaghetti of calls to other scripts. It’s not pretty. And not intuitive to audit.

An apipa address is a sign that networking is not working as intended. This should be resolved first before assigning a class C private addr manually.

deleted by creator

The ds211j is on synology DSM 6, which is ancient. I’ll look again, but I don’t think it supports btrfs.

I don’t use access control, I lock down with networking and filters.

But those are concerns for all containers, and not really an immich issue.

I agree, NFS is eazy peazy, livin greazy.

I have an old ds211j synology for backup. I just can’t bring myself to replace it, it still works. However, it doesn’t support zfs. I wish I could get another Linux running on this thing.

However, NFS does work on it and is so simple and easy to lock down, it works in a ton of corner cases like mine.

deleted by creator