I think y’all are getting into semantics here. There are different definitions, colloquially, of port and sequel. Mike Tyson’s Punch-Out on the NES might be neither a sequel nor a port depending on the definitions.

The ones that did better on consoles

This is what OP was asking about

I’m sure the rest of your comment is helpful and informative, but that first sentence got you a downvote from me.

You can add to someone’s point or even correct them without telling them they can’t talk about something.

He’s not the reason why the civilised world sneers at 'Murica, but he’s a huge symptom of it

As a Canadian, I used to sneer at the US like one would sneer at an immature sibling.

Now, “Made in the USA” feels dirty. I don’t feel like the USA can recover its place of former global respect in my lifetime.

You saying FF6 is not a core one that people know about makes me feel less bad about saying FF8 is in my bottom 2 of FF rankings, lol

I think you missed this reply

With a lot of companies no longer doing physical games, then would that give rise to more Piracy?

Probably about the same. People always find a way.

How will video game preservation work then?

Games are just data, whether physical or digital. What gets lost is the servers for online functionality an such.

“Potato is and noodles” of course.

Hah! I guess Sony argues that “who bought what” is not a “critical business purpose”…

I’m not here to defend the corporations.

Email addresses are PII under GDPR, aren’t they? So linking email addresses to purchase history is explicitly retaining PII and data about someone they can identify.

Day 1: “Let’s see how this goes.”

Day 2: “It’s up 20%? I can’t miss out on this gravy train!”

After drop: “It’ll go back up for sure.”

I don’t know how fast it was before it peaked, but not everybody bought right away. Or people added more money after they saw it going up.

Quietly? Do fungi typically feast loudly?

I think you forgot to finish the question in the post title

I thought you were asking how to defend yourself from someone trying to murder you, lol

To answer your actual question about legal defenses, use a car. Make it plausibly look like an accident.

If you’re in North America and you’re on trial for 1st degree murder where you killed someone with a car, you made it WAY too obvious, or you killed someone INCREDIBLY important.

You can take them outside, but they should be leashed.

And I don’t know why you’re making a demand like that. Why is your attitude like this?

If your usual reaction to finding out you’re doing something wrong is to demand a stranger change drastic things about your life to resolve a problem you’re causing, then it’s harder to have sympathy for the situation you described in your original post here given that we only have one side of the story.

I’d recommend using graphing paper (square grids). That got me through everything until the final dungeon (but it’ll still be manageable there!).

“Outdoor cats” as pets shouldn’t be a thing

Yes, not having legacy ports taking up space is a feature.

This is the first time I’ve heard this in my entire life! Thank you for that.

HDMI is not a legacy port; it’s still a commonly-used display standard.

Also, a dongle takes up extra space compared to simply having a port built-in.

I didn’t say they did or didn’t have HDMI ports. The comment I replied to said it’s a feature that you can buy a dongle to get the ports you need

EDIT: And in another comment, they say HDMI is a legacy port, so I’m guessing they don’t consider having an HDMI port to be a feature, lol

Did you just claim that not having ports is a feature? Lol

If you weren’t being facetious about that, I think you might’ve had too much of that Apple Kool-Aid.

…which is actually probably a flavour of Kool-Aid, lmao