I waddled onto the beach and stole found a computer to use.

🍁⚕️ 💽

Note: I’m moderating a handful of communities in more of a caretaker role. If you want to take one on, send me a message and I’ll share more info :)

  • 31 Posts
  • 489 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 5th, 2023

help-circle

  • You might be better off looking for a community where the moderation optimizes for that kind of discussion (ex. Removing low effort comments, requiring citations, academic oriented, etc). It’s harder to find an entire instance that matches those points, but there should be a few communities like that

    Then you can use the subscribed feed only, or block the communities you don’t like







  • Discussions often feel like they’re happening within an ideological bubble.

    While this can be true for some communities, I find that users here do still engage with other viewpoints when the discussions are in good faith.

    I think the reason why a lot of users lean in a certain political direction is because of

    • the origins of Lemmy
    • users that choose to leave the older platforms may have done so for social / political reasons
    • threadiverse is still relatively small

    Do you think Lemmy is at risk of becoming an echo chamber for leftist views, a sort of Truth Social, Parler, Gab, etc., esque platform, but for Leftists?

    I feel like we’re getting more politically diverse over time. It’s only a risk if we force a certain political leaning through moderation.

    Is this a problem we should be concerned about, or is it a natural result of Lemmy’s community-driven nature?

    Worth keeping an eye on to see how it changes over time

    How might we encourage more diverse political perspectives while still maintaining a respectful and inclusive environment?

    Mainly moderation. If a community or space is intended for a particular group, it’s perfectly fine to moderate how you see fit. If it is meant to be a general space, try to limit political biases when moderating and focus on bad faith comments.

    If a post/comment was in good faith, it’s more effective to let someone explain why it is wrong rather than removing it. Chances are that others can learn from the explanation (or that they were correct to begin with, and you’ll learn something)

    What are the potential benefits and drawbacks of having a more politically diverse user base on Lemmy?

    The benefits are easy, I can’t think of many drawbacks. Maybe:

    • More people = higher moderation costs (which can be dealt with by having bigger teams)
    • More drama (we have drama already)


  • Otter@lemmy.catoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlDuties fee on shipping?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    25 days ago

    I once won a promotion and I was sent some items for free. When I went to pick them up, I had to pay more than I would have been willing to pay if I bought the items, because of ‘duties and taxes’.

    I probably should have just refused the delivery, but I was young and didn’t know any better so I paid for my package. There was a receipt inside the box that listed the items as being somewhat expensive, so I assumed there was some weird accounting where I still had to pay the taxes despite getting them for free.

    I’ve bought and shipped a lot of items since then without ever having to pay upon pickup.










  • Otter@lemmy.catoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlWhat's wrong with bluesky?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    https://lemmy.ca/comment/12906744

    I talked about it in this comment, which should hopefully still be recent enough to be accurate

    It’s still too soon to tell what they will do. It’s totally possible that they will take the necessary steps to be properly decentralized by transferring control of the registry + protocol to an independent non profit.

    Right now I feel that they don’t have much of an incentive to do that, since the vast majority of their users won’t care.

    I would love to be proven wrong