All the call stuff is mediated by mmcli (from ModemManager), our shell scripts simply wrap around mmcli. How would imsd fit into that picture? Would we need to communicate via imsd rather than mmcli directly?

A developer of sxmo reached out to me, with posh working maybe sxmo next??? please comment if there is demand for this.

Another sxmo developer here: I’m definitely interested in acquiring a fairphone now thanks to the work you’ve put in, and of course on running sxmo on it then. We’re already merged a device profile for fp6 in our codebase: https://lists.sr.ht/~mil/sxmo-devel/patches/71431 and one of our developers is having success with it already. We’re typically running things a bit more bare-bones than other UIs; no systemd (but openrc), but I don’t think there’s much particular work on your end to do to support sxmo, right? The really difficult work is in the kernel patches of course and that is shared anyway.

That makes sense yes, good to hear!

This is most excellent work!! Heel erg bedankt!! Great that you even go to the trouble to test the emergency services, that’s one of things that makes me feel the most unease with our experimental phones… will it hold up in an emergency?

This has made be quire enthusiastic, so now I’m considering buying a fairphone 6+ too now (after you get yours and can confirm your patches work on it ;) )

I’ve been self-hosting e-mail for over 15 years and hope to continue doing so. Although it’s being made increasingly difficult by big tech players. I wrote about it here: https://proycon.anaproy.nl/posts/rant-against-centralising-e-mail/