This is true. However, if you simply forbid all “tools” or “actions” that are potentially harmful then there will be very little left the agent can actually do.
Every tool you give to an LLM agent might be used for “good” or “bad”. To filter malicious actions would need a way to classify the actions with confidence which imo would only work with human supervision.
However, I still think that the companies that develop such systems should still be responsible for what those systems do: They are the ones who pushed the “release” button on those systems.




I don’t see anyone here making this about hierarchy or anyone claiming that one group of people is “better” (or “worse”) than the others.
That Gen Z is scoring worse in those tests is a fact. Nobody says that Gen Z is “worse” because of that. If anything this might make previous generations look bad whose decisions lead to the world gen z has to grow up in: The school system, current crises, the pandemic, social media, etc.
To acknowledge those test results is the key to address what caused those results. Then we can discuss: