• 0 Posts
  • 34 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 30th, 2024

help-circle



  • I agree. Don’t think about it like going to the wedding or not. Decide if you want to cut ties with your brother and possibly other parts of your family. Maybe also people that don’t share his political opinions but still side with him in terms of the wedding. Chances are high that not going will permanently damage your relationship to your brother and possibly other family members that side with him. If you value your ideals higher than your family, that’s perfectly okay. But from perspective you aren’t forced to do that.





  • We could also run some heat pipes through the body to improve conductivity, stretch the skin to increase the surface etc.

    If the person doesn’t need to be alive to stay at a comfortable temperature we could even grind the body into a powder of tiny heat emitting particles. Then add a very fast flowing liquid with a good conductivity and our super hero heating system is good to go.

    But enough psychopath talk now. I personally don’t want to turn anyone into a heating system, but I’m sure capitalism will find a way to exploit this special property. :D






  • mostly automated, including cotton harvesting

    Do you have a source for that? As per the last documentaries I saw on this topic, sweatshops are still a huge topic in the textile industry. 10 years ago there was a horrible accident in Bangladesh where more than 1000 people were killed and another 2500 injured after the building of a single textile factory collapsed.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rana_Plaza_collapse

    As per the sources I know, conditions might have slightly (!!!) improved since then but still miles away from acceptable.

    More than 60 million people work in the textiles and garment industry across the world according to the International Labour Organization (ILO) – most of them in developing and emerging economies. Yet in many of these countries, production and working conditions fall short of internationally defined environmental and social standards.

    https://www.bmz.de/en/issues/textiles-industry

    Despite public outrage about substandard working conditions, the global garment and textile industry remains rife with cases of sweatshop conditions, union-busting, gender discrimination, and forced and child labour. Around the world, the rights and safety of garment workers are being systematically neglected.

    https://www.somo.nl/our-work/sectors/garment-and-textiles/

    Textile workers in underdeveloped countries face labor rights abuses, low pay, long hours, dangerous working conditions, and restricted access to healthcare and education. Gender discrimination is a significant issue, particularly for women.

    https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-5341-3_19

    Today, the textile sector is one of the largest economic sectors globally in terms of production amount, labor employment, and gross domestic product. At the same time, it is also one of the least sustainable sectors due to its profound negative environmental and social impacts

    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/15589250231220359

    Also it’s the first time that I hear that fashion is manufactured mostly in automated processes. I always heard that it’s highly labor intensive because the styles permanently change, batches are small and complex designs still can’t be automated in an economic way. As far as I know, there are no machines that can produce the numerous different models of shirts, trousers, backpacks, jackets, caps, dresses, skirts etc. that we see in fast fashion.



  • Would it be racist to now give more money to the darker skinned people?

    From my perspective, yes.

    The redistribution of the generational wealth should be adressed as well by politics but that should be independent of the racism discussion. Significantly unequal distribution of money due to inheritance is more and more dividing society. But I don’t care if the rich people have a lighter or darker tan.

    If you target inequality with inequality in the opposite direction, you’re just feeding rightwing narratives IMO.