The 3rd paragraph is really confusing to me. What is this about a satyr? Also why talk about god and midas? I’m really confused lol.

I’m not sure why you mention OpenAI alignment, because neither Pony/Stable Diffusion, nor T5 XXL/Flan are related to OpenAI?

Okay, but the “words” for your prompt are coming from text you see in the images output by the model? Or you’re writing your own words in a way that follows “rules” you’ve derived from that text?

If I understand correctly, you’re trying to interpret gibberish text in the image output and write prompts in a similar style?

Can confirm

This behavior is associated with autism

Returning the shopping cart

Dunno why this is downvoted because RAG is the correct answer. Fine tuning/training is not the tool for this job. RAG is.

Just climbing over the walls to get to my center cubicle

That’s great! Hopefully it shows up on F-Droid sometime soon

This is plainly incorrect

EDIT: nvm OP has edited the post

It has value in natural language processing, like turning unstructured natural language data into structured data. Not suitable for all situations though, like situations that cannot tolerate hallucinations.

Its also good for reorganizing information and presenting it in a different format; and also classification of semantic meaning of text. It’s good for pretty much anything dealing with semantic meaning, really.

I see people often trying to use generative AI as a knowledge store, such as asking an AI assistant factual questions, but this is an invalid usecase.

Seems pedantic. You know what they are asking!

We ought to at least try our best

🤷 I still say yes and I still think it would be profound and perspective changing to create something “like us” with silicon

I also don’t think AI and science are mutually exclusive. I don’t mean asking the AI questions about consciousness and getting answers directly from it like an LLM chatbot, but the fact that we can make it and scientific study + observation of the AGI phenomenon might provide some answers

And even if we develop AGI that is just like us, maybe you’re right and maybe it proves absolutely nothing about souls, but it at least narrows the requirements and eliminates some common reasoning, which should be in everyone’s interests, because it could further define and help us understand the nature of the hypothetical soul

Yes, to answer questions about consciousness and prove that we aren’t special or have super special magical souls

lemmy.ml has earned itself a pretty bad reputation, although there are instances that are worse. They keep things clean enough to not get defederated, but you’re not really in sane company on there.

I don’t really get this, shouldn’t this be a budget feature for cheap GPUs to cheat at rendering? If you buy an expensive GPU, why would you be interested in fake frames?

I remind myself “it’s just life” and that “no one makes it out of life alive”

A tiny bit of nihilism goes a long way