• 0 Posts
  • 66 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 26th, 2024

help-circle


  • Sounds lovely, until you and the employer stop being on the same page about the tiniest of things.

    Then it starts spiraling into a personal housing security crisis.

    And you can forget about thinking of changing jobs any time soon. The moment your 2 weeks end, you’re homeless.

    The tenant and labour union stuff sounds nice, but they’re not a magical fix. They can and often are bought and controled. While better than the alternative, they’re not a guarantee of protectedness.

    This doesn’t mean the model is dead on arrival. It’s just not one I’d choose. I’d rather have a seperate boss and landlord, thank you very much.





  • The alarm is fucking stupid on some models.

    I will not put on my seatbelt when I take the car out of the garage for a wash 2 feet in front of it.

    I would also like the car to be “smart” enough not to beep that it’s in reverse before I had the chance to change it out of reverse myself. And of course, the tone is a 120hz sine wave and way too loud. Great to calm the nerves right before work or a long road trip.

    And you know what’s the bonus point? The headlight on alarm is quiet like a fucking lullaby. Of course my battery died once.

    I can guarantee the tones being as loud and obnoxious as they are is the reason people turn them off or buy those clamps to fake wearing a seatbelt.

    Even when people use them, they do, they annoy and distract. Which causes accidents.

    I’m not going to claim that they cause more accidents than they prevent, but I will claim that these are the most preventable accidents as they are actively caused by literal safety features!



  • One thing I really dislike about the Mobile ecosystem is how much different each device is to each other.

    I thought you were sarcastic when I first read this part, since way back when phones used to be innovative in both hardware and software. The current market offerings are all carbon copies of eachother with a strong trend towards converging into the exact same lineup.

    Multiple cameras, one in front, 2+ in back. A power button and two for volume. Reader apps may hijack it for scroll. Gesture movements. Fingerprint and face id. Less and less conusmer freedom in software choice. Irremovable battery. No removable back plate. A rectangular brick. A near-100% display area. No headphone jack or SD card, with SIM on the way out.

    Covers the vast majority of offerings on the market, with a few slight adds/subtracts. Dumbphones are a rounding error.

    This definition covers even tablets, and it isn’t even deliverately vague.

    Without much experimentation and development on the hardware front, no wonder software’s behaving exactly the same.

    There just isn’t enough interest for proper innovation and experimentation.


  • That’s nice to have. For both GIMP and the industry’s sake, priorities should be:

    • good UX
    • feature-wise competitiveness
    • in any (sensible) format

    GIMP is an alternative to Photoshop. It isn’t a psd reader.

    Being the format jack of all trades yet master of none isn’t too great of an idea. It’ll just exacerbate GIMP’s main current problem: an ancient UI Photoshop enthusiasts dread. A lot might consider switching if the bad GIMP UX was better than the also-bad Photoshop UX.

    If I had to say what my main design gripe with gimp is, that’d be modularity. Seperate the ui (skins) from the tools, effects and rendering (formats). The UI is especially egregious in its hard-codedness while effects are pretty well-supported.

    A few more apis would go a long way. Hell, even the closed Photoshop has open(ish) apis, since even Adobe know the value of an ecosystem and not just their internal r&d department!


  • Maybe that’s what it was. It doesn’t necessarily need to be that going forward, as project putlooks anf goals change with time.

    Also editing is quite a lot of more work to support than mere viewing. As all tools and actions need to behave correctly - not jusbt the renderer.

    And something proprietary can hadly be a “industry standard”. It can be “most common” or a “de facto standard”. But all “industry standards” are by definition open as any industry worth its weight doesn’t rely on or include a single point of failure anywhere within itself.





  • It’s also an opportunity to reconcile. Not that OP seems to want that, nor would the aunts most likely want that, but sometimes such events just make things… Click.

    Having okay relations with relatives is important, and afuneral is an opportunity for things to improve. That’s just pure sociology. You aunts will spin it into “God works in mysterious ways”, but it’s the same core thing with a culty religious spin.

    So my take is: bite your teeth and attend the funeral. It’s a one-time investment of a few hours. Odds are the aunts won’t want to make issues. Maybe it fixes things. Your fathed did ask nicely, after all. And it’d be nice to honour his request. Any semi-okay relatives would respect that, religious or otherwise.

    YMMW if they’re as fake as you say they are (religion is a hell of a drug), but if it doesn’t go the ideal way, you did your part and they failed theirs. If you don’t go, it’ll be the other way around because Christians unfortunately eork like that. And they like holding grudges. A funeral is (unfortunately) one of the few “chances” to reconcile. Shame someone needs to quite literally die for them to be this open to reconcoliation.

    Speaking like an ex-christian raised in the tradition: this could be your opportunity to get things to smooth over. They’re bound be as open to reconciliation as possible. Just don’t force it. Keep your distance and honour your dad’s wishes. Forcing things will have the opposite effect of seeming disingenuous. No action other than showing up necessary.

    The amount of families reconciled at christian funerals I’ve witnessed is in the low 20’s.