11·
2 months agoTHE YEAR
- 0 Posts
- 19 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: December 27th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
31·2 months agodeleted by creator
3·5 months agoWell obvs the bots got offended
deleted by creator
Is there a mental health service in country? They may be able to help or get you in touch with other helpful services.
It’s so good!
My work forced a recent macbook pro on me. One of those with the ARM chip.
I am in awe of the quality of that macbook.
No this is Patrick
Isn’t composting a form of recycling?
Maybe there are update logs? Not sure if those persist after a factory reset though
What? Caterpillar is evolving?
Donate monthly to Wikipedia
Make it unobtrusive. Otherwise reconsider
deleted by creator
Brush your teeth and floss
Except if you want to do good science. Good scientists will identify false confidence and will aim to steer well clear of it
A rambling piece that boils down to a poorly substantiated opinion.
Namely, the author is under the impression that the wikimedia foundation spends unnecessarily and that, because they raised more than they spend, they should reword their requests for donations.
I half agree with the last point although the author doesn’t seem to understand that a couple of tens of millions is not a lot of money for a foundation of wikimedia’s calibre.
As for the first point: the author simply assumes that the spending is unnecessary. This is at best substantiated with other people’s opinions. If the author had presented actual detail on the expenditures, they could’ve made an actual case. However, the absence of such detail gives off the impression that there is no real substance to this criticism