deleted by creator

Hardly, you need to maintain the same numbers to double check the work of AI. Haven’t improved throughput, but this guarantees better quality

I think it’s the other way around. They said we need to slow down AI so this story is now being told

If we’re making up numbers my point is that with 100 employees using AI you get 2x the quality than 50 employees using AI

Because now you exluded the option of having the employee choose which applications to have Ai process and which need human review - the option that delivers the most quality

Because saying it is bad to bomb children should not be controversial and we need to set that expectation.

Because the alternative to saving money with AI is providing better services with AI - if it can be done. And the people to do that are the people doing the job.

I find this kind of response insufferable. It shifts the conversation from a systems critique to personal responsibility. You could have posted this in response the OP, and it would be equally on point and useless.

I have personalized ads turned of in YouTube and it seems half the ads are for gambling as of late.

And anyone who has a retirement holding index funds is also complicit?

Being critAI is being proAI.

China has HOAs…

Someone give this person a congressional hearing and billions of dollars to burn

It’s what follows the signifiers that’s the tell

Yes, using the word “capitalism” is a signifier, but I wouldn’t say it’s counterproductive. Based on a person’s response you can quickly conclude whether they have the historical context to understand the critique. Defining capitalism as “a market-based” system is ahistorical , markets existed before capitalism. It is very hard to surface the critique while also writing a wall of text that describes how capitalism came to be and how it was later moderated

The issue is the term is meaningless if it isn’t grounded in history. If it simply means “the system you live in” then it says nothing of how it came to be and what can come after.

And if we had universal healthcare it would actually be cheaper to produce those cars. Canada is proof of this.

You could say the same of history if you know nothing about it

You would think seeing how we spend more on prisons then our schools…

It’s good for the artists, popularity is decided by the masses instead of a channel. But it’s bad for share holder value.