The UK Post Office should at least have considered open source software for Horizon to enhance transparency, empower users, and avoid vendor lock-in, which could have prevented or mitigated the scandal’s impact. People like Richard Moorhead, Christopher Hodges, Alan Bates, and the long running Computer Weekly coverage all underscore the need for transparency and accountability, indirectly supporting open source principles, although direct advocacy is rare. For future systems, the Post Office and similar organizations should prioritize open source to prevent such injustices.
The establishment narrative often focuses on individual accountability rather than systemic issues like software design. But this overlooks how proprietary systems enabled the Post Office to deflect responsibility.
Open source software aligns with ethical principles of justice, autonomy, and resource stewardship, making it a compelling alternative for future public sector IT projects.
Thoughts?!
The name “Perfidious Albion” is more than 800 years old. You should not be surprised by our bullshit.
Removed by mod
All-time Botposting Greatest Hits
Removed by mod
Going into unrelated discussions and replying with the content of different threads does not support your claim you aren’t astroturfing, otherwise why would you be trying to harrass me on irrelevent parts of the platform?
Removed by mod
Disengage, we already have a thread for this.
Removed by mod