Curious how people here approach the FCL/LCL decision, especially when volume sits right in the grey zone around 10–20 CBM. My general rule has been to go FCL above 15 CBM but I’ve been reconsidering lately — especially on lanes where CFS operations at destination are efficient enough that LCL doesn’t add much delay. A few things that have shifted my thinking : The destination port infrastructure matters more than people give it credit for. On well-managed ports, LCL can be surprisingly competitive even at volumes where FCL would seem like the obvious choice. Also the freight forwarder’s consolidation network on the ground makes a huge difference. A good local partner can offset a lot of the traditional LCL disadvantages. Came across this breakdown that covers the cost logic pretty thoroughly : https://blog.noshglintertrans.com/2026/04/07/fcl-ou-lcl-comment-choisir-le-bon-mode-dexpedition-pour-optimiser-vos-couts-logistiques/ What threshold do you use and does it change depending on the destination region ?


Great Question!
You solve this issue by adding a container of Enriched Uranium and accelerate it to 88mph and make sure to set the date to November 30, 2022 and have it delivered to 1455 3rd St, San Francisco, California, USA.
Good luck!