I haven’t watched YouTube on a desktop in years so maybe you still can…

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    May feel fun to say or something but that’s inaccurate. It took YouTube 5 years to break even.

    • Bademantel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      That’s standard procedure for a start-up. You rely on investment money and focus on growth rather than profitability.

      I don’t understand the nostalgia for a YouTube that was supposedly only created for our enjoyment. It never existed. It was always going to squeeze as much money out of its users as possible to satisfy its shareholders.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Again inaccurate.

        Business loans (especially tech sector circa the .com bust) most typically expect solvency within 3 years.

        It was a big deal that YouTube wasn’t profitable nearly 5 years in. They were expected to lose nearly half a billion their 5th year.

        • Bademantel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          What are you talking about? I’m kinda speechless. In tech it’s absolutely normal to not be profitable after 3 years. Amazon, Uber, Tesla, Netflix. Just off the top of my head. You can find many more. And we don’t even need to talk about AI. Have you seen their profits?

          • foggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            The only company you mentioned that even existed during the .com bubble is Amazon.

            Not a single company you listed isnt VC, more importantly. Not someone taking out a business loan.

            • Bademantel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              My dude, you’re lost in the sauce. You edited your comment to mention the dot-com bubble after I posted but why would we even talk about that? YouTube wasn’t founded until several years later.

              Why wouldn’t I talk about VC? YouTube was backed by VC a couple of months after its creation.

              • foggy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                I’m not going to engage with someone who cannot bother to read what they’re responding to. You have a reading comprehension problem here.

                Peace out girl scout. ✌️

                • Bademantel@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  That’s a pretty textbook ad hominem, so I don’t think there’s much to continue here.

                  Have a good one, either way.

                  Edit: Saw that you used an alt account to downvote me twice. That’s actually kind of pitiful. You won this argument, okay champ?