EatingOnions@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 1 month ago‘We don’t want to be cannon fodder’: Lukashenko rules out sending troops to Ukrainetvpworld.comexternal-linkmessage-square18linkfedilinkarrow-up1149arrow-down10
arrow-up1149arrow-down1external-link‘We don’t want to be cannon fodder’: Lukashenko rules out sending troops to Ukrainetvpworld.comEatingOnions@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square18linkfedilink
minus-squaretestaccount372920@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 month agoBelarus has said since the start of the war that they won’t send troops, so nothing new. It also makes sense, since they’re both a buffer zone between Russia and NATO, and they’re awfully much in strike range of Ukrainian aerial attacks.
minus-squareOptional@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 month agoYes but Luka is owned completely and totally by Pooty-poot, so he wouldn’t announce that if it hadn’t been vetted, right?
minus-squareCalavera@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoHow can they be a buffer zone if Russia can use them as base for attacks anytime they want?
minus-squaretestaccount372920@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 month agoBuffer zone for Russia, not for NATO
minus-squareCalavera@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 month agoSo they sending troops to support Russia don’t change the status quo
Belarus has said since the start of the war that they won’t send troops, so nothing new. It also makes sense, since they’re both a buffer zone between Russia and NATO, and they’re awfully much in strike range of Ukrainian aerial attacks.
Yes but Luka is owned completely and totally by Pooty-poot, so he wouldn’t announce that if it hadn’t been vetted, right?
How can they be a buffer zone if Russia can use them as base for attacks anytime they want?
Buffer zone for Russia, not for NATO
So they sending troops to support Russia don’t change the status quo